Re: [gmx-users] No such moleculetype SOL

2013-09-21 Thread Mark Abraham
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Jonathan Saboury jsab...@gmail.com wrote: I am doing this tutorial: http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/biphasic/index.html I have set up the randomly placed cyclohexane and water throughout the box. The problem is when i try

Re: [gmx-users] Reverse_MICELLEFatel error, moleculetype SOL is redefined

2013-07-16 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/16/13 1:02 AM, Hari Pandey wrote: Hi Gromaxers, Thanks for previous answers. I have to simulate reverse micelle after solvation with isooctane.My system now is: ISOOCTANE(solvent)+AOT(surfactant)+coreWATER. When I do grompp, it says moleculetype SOL is redefined and lots of another

Re: [gmx-users] No such moleculetype SOL

2010-07-07 Thread Mark Abraham
- Original Message - From: nanogroup nanogr...@ymail.com Date: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 18:16 Subject: [gmx-users] No such moleculetype SOL To: gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org Cc: gmx-users@gromacs.org --- | Dear GMX Users, I

Re: [gmx-users] No such moleculetype SOL

2010-07-07 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
nanogroup wrote: Dear Mark, Many thanks for your e-mail. I checked the TOP file, the SOL is diefined there and numbers of solvent moelcules are presented. If this were true, you wouldn't have gotten the error you did. The best information you can provide is the relevant section of

Re: [gmx-users] No such moleculetype SOL

2010-07-07 Thread Mark Abraham
- Original Message - From: nanogroup nanogr...@ymail.com Date: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 21:51 Subject: [gmx-users] No such moleculetype SOL To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Cc: mark.abra...@anu.edu.au --- | Dear Mark, Many thanks for

Re: [gmx-users] Fatal error: moleculetype SOL is redefined.

2006-05-09 Thread Mark Abraham
Absalom Zamorano wrote: Strangely enough, the problem is here: Fatal error: moleculetype SOL is redefined Find where moleculetype SOL is defined in your .top file - perhaps implicitly through an #include - and you should see it defined more than once. Evidently you can't do this :-) Mark