[gmx-users] g_hbond on concatenated trajectory

2010-10-15 Thread Carla Jamous
Hi everyone, please I need some help on g_hbond. I concatenated 3 trajectories. I ran g_hbond on the concatenated trajectory. I got the result of h_bonds. Then I wanted to run g_hbond on each of my 3 trajectories. Here, I get a different result, it means: if I take the first 10ps of my

Re: [gmx-users] g_hbond on concatenated trajectory

2010-10-15 Thread Erik Marklund
Carla Jamous skrev 2010-10-15 12.05: Hi everyone, please I need some help on g_hbond. I concatenated 3 trajectories. I ran g_hbond on the concatenated trajectory. I got the result of h_bonds. Then I wanted to run g_hbond on each of my 3 trajectories. Here, I get a different result, it

Re: [gmx-users] g_hbond on concatenated trajectory

2010-10-15 Thread Carla Jamous
No, I don't think so because I did an .eps file (with xpm2ps) that indicates the Time(ps) in x-axis and Hydrogen Bond Index in y-axis. This is the way I'm reading my matrix. Carla On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Erik Marklund er...@xray.bmc.uu.sewrote: Carla Jamous skrev 2010-10-15 12.05:

Re: [gmx-users] g_hbond on concatenated trajectory

2010-10-15 Thread Erik Marklund
Yes, and it's the y-direction that is tricky. If I'm not mistaken, the first row in the matrix is the *bottom* line in the graphical output. Thus, the bottom line in the picture would be the first hbond in the corresponding index file. Erik Carla Jamous skrev 2010-10-15 12.12: No, I don't

[gmx-users] Fatal error in g_enemat using GMX4.5.1

2010-10-15 Thread zhongjin
Hi all, I am using gmx4.5.1 g_enemat ,came across a error, g_enemat -f pull.edr -groups -emat, Opened pull.edr as single precision energy file Will read groupnames from inputfile Read 1 groups group 0WARNING! could not find group (null):K-K (0,0)in energy file Will select half-matrix of

Re: [gmx-users] g_hbond on concatenated trajectory

2010-10-15 Thread Erik Marklund
Carla Jamous skrev 2010-10-15 12.05: Hi everyone, please I need some help on g_hbond. I concatenated 3 trajectories. I ran g_hbond on the concatenated trajectory. I got the result of h_bonds. Then I wanted to run g_hbond on each of my 3 trajectories. Here, I get a different result, it

Re: [gmx-users] g_hbond on concatenated trajectory

2010-10-15 Thread Carla Jamous
I'm sorry I don't understand, because your last answer doesn't correspond to what's written in the manual. I'm using gromacs 4.0.3 and the manual says: -hbm: existence matrix. Ordering is identical to that in -hbn index file. And yes, my trajectory is concatenated the way I intended to, but I

Re: [gmx-users] g_hbond on concatenated trajectory

2010-10-15 Thread Erik Marklund
The tricky part is that if you look at the first line in the file hbm.xpm you are looking at the bottom row of the matrix when displayed with gimp or after converting to xpm2ps. The same line corresponds to the first hbond in hbn.ndx. That sentence in the manual is therefore a bit ambiguous.

[gmx-users] Questions about REMD calculations

2010-10-15 Thread chris . neale
Stefane, for more information on what Mark is talking about here, check out his publication: M. J. Abraham and J. E. Gready (2008) Ensuring Mixing Efficiency of Replica-Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations J. Chem. Theory Comput. (4), 1119-1128. Dear all, I come back to you for several

Re: [gmx-users] Re: Re: Re: g_velacc problem (Florian Dommert)

2010-10-15 Thread Florian Dommert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/15/2010 01:09 AM, Eudes Fileti wrote: Dear Florian, thanks again. I have worked with confined systems, where motion in a given direction/plane is preferred. The accuracy of the MSD approach for calculating the diffusion coefficient has

[gmx-users] g_hbond results inconsistent between v4.0.7 and v4.5.1

2010-10-15 Thread chris . neale
Has anybody checked g_hbond results for consistency between v4.0.7 and v4.5.1? My usage is: g_hbond -f my.xtc -r 0.68 -contact -life -s my.tpr -ac and I find that the output files hbnum.xvg, hbac.xvg, hblife.xvg, and the ac-reported lifetime of interactions are all different. To show the

[gmx-users] g_hbond results inconsistent between v4.0.7 and v4.5.1

2010-10-15 Thread chris . neale
If I redo this, selecting only a single acceptor atom and 64 donor atoms, with a large cutoff distance of 3 nm, v4.0.7 gives me 44 should have read 4 nm above. the point is that there really are 44 contacts, but v4.5.1 reports only 1. contacts in one frame while v4.5.1 gives me only 1

Re: [gmx-users] g_hbond results inconsistent between v4.0.7 and v4.5.1

2010-10-15 Thread Erik Marklund
chris.ne...@utoronto.ca skrev 2010-10-15 16.58: If I redo this, selecting only a single acceptor atom and 64 donor atoms, with a large cutoff distance of 3 nm, v4.0.7 gives me 44 should have read 4 nm above. the point is that there really are 44 contacts, but v4.5.1 reports only 1.

[gmx-users] genbox solvent addition inhomogeneous?

2010-10-15 Thread Pim Frederix
Dear users, When I'm trying to create my solve box of 12x12x12 nm I encounter some trouble. I'm using Gromacs 4.5 with the MARTINI force field to set up a system of 400 dipeptide molecules in water. However when I use genbox -cp coarse grained dipeptidebox -cs MARTINI example water box -vdwd

[gmx-users] Memory allocation - xpm2ps

2010-10-15 Thread Maurício Menegatti Rigo
Hi, I found the following error when I tried to run xpm2ps. *** glibc detected *** xpm2ps: realloc(): invalid pointer: 0x00dd0541 *** === Backtrace: = /lib/libc.so.6[0x7f20a53b0dd6] /lib/libc.so.6(realloc+0x2e1)[0x7f20a53b67e1] xpm2ps(save_realloc+0x5e)[0x43741e]

Re: [gmx-users] Memory allocation - xpm2ps

2010-10-15 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Maurício Menegatti Rigo wrote: Hi, I found the following error when I tried to run xpm2ps. *** glibc detected *** xpm2ps: realloc(): invalid pointer: 0x00dd0541 *** === Backtrace: = /lib/libc.so.6[0x7f20a53b0dd6] /lib/libc.so.6(realloc+0x2e1)[0x7f20a53b67e1]

[gmx-users] mdrun-gpu error

2010-10-15 Thread Renato Freitas
Hi there, I have installed the gromacs-4.5.1 and it was running without problems. Also I installed the GPU version of GROMACS (gromacs-4.5-GPU-beta2). I have a GTX 480, and the CUDA libraries and NVIDIA driver are installed. Then I tried to run the test provided by Alan with the mdrun-gpu and I

Re: [gmx-users] Memory allocation - xpm2ps

2010-10-15 Thread Maurício Menegatti Rigo
Hi, Thank you for your answer. Unfortunately, I can't fix my problem. I dont know if I'm doing this right, but first I type the line *git clone git://git.gromacs.org/gromacs.git* in the command line. After all the outputs, I tried to run xpm2ps again, but occured the same error. 2010/10/15

Re: [gmx-users] Memory allocation - xpm2ps

2010-10-15 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Maurício Menegatti Rigo wrote: Hi, Thank you for your answer. Unfortunately, I can't fix my problem. I dont know if I'm doing this right, but first I type the line /git clone git://git.gromacs.org/gromacs.git http://git.gromacs.org/gromacs.git/ in the command line. After all the

Re: [gmx-users] mdrun-gpu error

2010-10-15 Thread Roland Schulz
You should use the latest GROMACS version also for the GPU. Thus compile the 4.5.1 for the GPU and run this. On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Renato Freitas renato...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, I have installed the gromacs-4.5.1 and it was running without problems. Also I installed the GPU

RE: [gmx-users] mdrun-gpu error

2010-10-15 Thread Osmair Oliveira
Hi Renato, Fatal error: reading tpx file (md.tpr) version 73 with version 71 program This error occur because you are using different version of the gromacs. Are you sure that the version of the grompp is the same of the mdrun I hope this help. Prof. Dr. Osmair V. Oliveira Federal Institute

Re: [gmx-users] Memory allocation - xpm2ps

2010-10-15 Thread Maurício Menegatti Rigo
Hi, I copy the file gmx_xpm2ps from the repository to my gromacs folder /usl/local/gromacs/src/tools (i.e. I substitute the old file by the new one). After that, I run xpm2ps and the problem persisted. Any ideas? PS: I run the same job in another i7, but with gromacs version 4.0.7 installed,

Re: [gmx-users] Memory allocation - xpm2ps

2010-10-15 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Maurício Menegatti Rigo wrote: Hi, I copy the file gmx_xpm2ps from the repository to my gromacs folder /usl/local/gromacs/src/tools (i.e. I substitute the old file by the new one). After that, I run xpm2ps and the problem persisted. Any ideas? As I said before, you have to actually

[gmx-users] eigenvectors in readable format

2010-10-15 Thread Ramachandran G
Hi gmx users: I did normal mode analysis and got the hessian.mtx . Using the command g_nmeig_d on the hessian.mtx i got the eigenfreq.xvg, eigenval.xvg, eigenvec.trr. I need the complete eigenvector in the readable format. How i can get it? Thank you. with regards, Rama -- Postdoctoral

[gmx-users] How does g_msd calculates MSD?

2010-10-15 Thread Julian
Hi everybody, We're trying to understand how gromacs g_msd calculates MSD (without reading through the C code, I really don't know much about it, and there are hundreds of lines). (What we want to do is to calculate MSD properly in our supercooled water simulations, i.e., to choose correctly

[gmx-users] Re: eigenvectors in readable format

2010-10-15 Thread Ramachandran G
Hi, Can anyone help to get the eigen vector in ascii format. I have with me the trajectory file 'eigenvec.trr'. On using g_covar_d, i got the the ascii format file 'covar.dat' and it has covariance matrix of 3(NxN) number. But i am not interested in that. I am interested in getting the