, since position restraints can only be applied per
[moleculetype].
-Justin
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
On 10/31/12 3:55 PM, Alex Marshall wrote:
Chris, is that for freeze groups or position restraints?
I will assume Chris was referring
. Is it actually possible to only apply position restraints to some
molecules within a species and leave the rest alone?
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
On 10/31/12 3:55 PM, Alex Marshall wrote:
Chris, is that for freeze groups or position restraints?
I
want to freeze so that they're identified with the appropriate topology
file. Does this sound like it would work? Is there some other way that you
might do it?
Thanks
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Alex Marshall amars...@uwo.ca wrote:
Justin: I'll try using position restraints instead
file. Does this sound like it would work? Is there some other way that you
might do it?
Thanks
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Alex Marshall amarsh59 at uwo.ca wrote:
Justin: I'll try using position restraints instead of freezing the water
in the tube. Thanks for the tip.
Bogdan: I
. I'll check the manual again though. Thanks.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Bogdan Costescu bcoste...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Alex Marshall amars...@uwo.ca wrote:
Thanks Justin. I identified the offending waters using vmd (adding 1 to
resID and atom number since vmd
24, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
On 10/24/12 3:17 PM, Alex Marshall wrote:
Hi all,
I'm simulating a system of two reservoirs connected by a carbon nanotube.
The reservoir wall atoms and carbon nanotube atoms are held in place using
freeze groups at all times. I'm
20 ns
two of the frozen water molecules have jumped outside of the nanotube into
a supposedly inaccessible region. What could cause this? Should I be
worried?
--
Thanks,
Alex Marshall
M.Sc
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
--
Alex Marshall
M.Sc. Candidate
Department
for each reservoir
Is there any way I could automate/improve this process? I have ten of
these simulations longer than 100 ns to analyze, and I just need more
data points than I can crank out manually.
Thanks.
--
Alex Marshall
M.Sc. Candidate
Department of Applied Mathematics
The University of Western
post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
--
Alex Marshall
M.Sc. Candidate
Department of Applied Mathematics
The University of Western Ontario
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Only plain text messages
/Support/Mailing_Lists
--
Alex Marshall
M.Sc. Candidate
Department of Applied Mathematics
The University of Western Ontario
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support
Thanks Mark!
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.auwrote:
On 28/01/2012 7:09 AM, Alex Marshall wrote:
Hi all,
I was trying to extend my simulation but I used the wrong .tpr file when I
called mdrun_mpi. I didn't catch it in time and my checkpoint files were
), but
when I use mdrun_mpi -append with the extended .tpr file, new output files
are generated anyway. Is there a way around this, or will I just have to
use trjcat or something once the new run has finished?
Thanks.
--
Alex Marshall
M.Sc. Candidate
Department of Applied Mathematics
The University
Hi all,
I'm trying to calculate the force on one particle and the total
electrostatic energy of my system, which consists of a lattice of 25 evenly
spaced charges in the xy plane and a single charge in the center above to
preserve charge neutrality. The reference values I have been given are in
= 1 it is 1electronic
charge. I would suggest not to use the reduced units for LJ in this
scenario.
Amit
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Alex Marshall amars...@uwo.ca wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to calculate the force on one particle and the total
electrostatic energy of my system, which
be
correct and for that you should switch to standard gromacs units.
Also why do you need to use gmx.ff, seems to me that you already have the
parameters (ie the LJ parameters and charges)
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Alex Marshall amars...@uwo.ca wrote:
Hi Amit,
So if I understand you
0 23 H 12
CHR H3 23 1 1 H 0 0 ; qtot 0 24 H 12 CHR H6 24 -1 1 H 0 0 ; qtot 0 25 H 13
CHR H3 25 1 1 H 0 0 ; qtot 0 26 H 13 CHR H6 26 -1 1 H 0 0 ; qtot 0
Thanks,
Alex Marshall
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search
17 matches
Mail list logo