Re: [gmx-users] Re: Charmm 36 forcefield with verlet cut-off scheme

2013-09-23 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 9/20/13 7:59 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:

Note that the group scheme does not reproduce the (AFAIK unpublished)
CHARMM switching scheme, either.



In case anyone is interested, the reference cited in the CHARMM papers for the 
switching and shifting functions is dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540150702.


-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441

==
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] Re: Charmm 36 forcefield with verlet cut-off scheme

2013-09-23 Thread akk5r
With what was said: what do you all think of the following parameters for
Charmm 36:

rlist = 1.2
rlistlong = 1.4
vdwtype = cutoff
rvdw-switch = 1.0
rvdw = 1.2
rcouloumb = 1.2
vdw-modifier = Potential-shift-Verlet
DispCorr = No
cutoff-scheme = Verlet

--
View this message in context: 
http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Charmm-36-forcefield-with-verlet-cut-off-scheme-tp5011322p5011413.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Re: Charmm 36 forcefield with verlet cut-off scheme

2013-09-23 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 9/23/13 4:04 PM, akk5r wrote:

With what was said: what do you all think of the following parameters for
Charmm 36:

rlist = 1.2
rlistlong = 1.4
vdwtype = cutoff
rvdw-switch = 1.0
rvdw = 1.2
rcouloumb = 1.2
vdw-modifier = Potential-shift-Verlet
DispCorr = No
cutoff-scheme = Verlet



rvdw-switch has no effect here, and I have no real hard evidence to know whether 
or not this will produce the same effect as the traditional settings.  You would 
have to carefully demonstrate that what you're doing doesn't break the force field.


-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441

==
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Re: Charmm 36 forcefield with verlet cut-off scheme

2013-09-20 Thread Mark Abraham
Note that the group scheme does not reproduce the (AFAIK unpublished)
CHARMM switching scheme, either.

Mark

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:


 On 9/19/13 9:55 PM, akk5r wrote:

 Thanks Justin. I was told that the vdwtype = switch was an essential
 component of running Charmm36. Is that not the case?


 It is, but I suppose one can achieve a similar effect with the Verlet
 scheme. You can certainly use the traditional CHARMM settings if you use the
 group scheme, instead.  The vdw-modifier setting should give you a
 comparable result, but I have never tried it myself.


 -Justin

 --
 ==

 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Postdoctoral Fellow

 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
 School of Pharmacy
 Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
 University of Maryland, Baltimore
 20 Penn St.
 Baltimore, MD 21201

 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441

 ==
 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
 interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] Re: Charmm 36 forcefield with verlet cut-off scheme

2013-09-19 Thread akk5r
Thanks Justin. I was told that the vdwtype = switch was an essential
component of running Charmm36. Is that not the case?

--
View this message in context: 
http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Charmm-36-forcefield-with-verlet-cut-off-scheme-tp5011322p5011328.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Re: Charmm 36 forcefield with verlet cut-off scheme

2013-09-19 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 9/19/13 9:55 PM, akk5r wrote:

Thanks Justin. I was told that the vdwtype = switch was an essential
component of running Charmm36. Is that not the case?



It is, but I suppose one can achieve a similar effect with the Verlet scheme. 
You can certainly use the traditional CHARMM settings if you use the group 
scheme, instead.  The vdw-modifier setting should give you a comparable result, 
but I have never tried it myself.


-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441

==
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists