________________________________
From: "gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org" <gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 1:05 PM
Subject: gmx-users Digest, Vol 92, Issue 138
Send gmx-users mailing list submissions to
gmx-users@gromacs.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
gmx-users-ow...@gromacs.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of gmx-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: -pbc nojump (mohammad agha)
2. positive potential energy (Zahra
M)
3. Re: positive potential energy (Zahra M)
4. Re: Re: positive potential energy (Mark Abraham)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:54:54 -0800 (PST)
From: mohammad agha <mra...@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] -pbc nojump
To: "gmx-users@gromacs.org" <gmx-users@gromacs.org>
Message-ID:
<1325127294.34356.yahoomail...@web125705.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Thank you very much from your reply.
Best Regards
Sara
________________________________
From: Tsjerk Wassenaar <tsje...@gmail.com>
To: mohammad agha <mra...@yahoo.com>; Discussion list for GROMACS users
<gmx-users@gromacs.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 1:56 AM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] -pbc nojump
Hi Sara,
Please keep discussions on the list. I'm not your private tutor.
Whether you can do your analysis depends on the analysis you want to
do. But if your aim is analyzing the formation of the micelle, you're
probably better of reversing the trajectory.
> 1- trjconv -f md.trr -o md1.xtc -n index.ndx -pbc whole
-s md.tpr
This makes molecules whole, which is fine. Clustering should make
molecules whole too, though, making this step redundant.
> 2- trjconv -f md1.xtc -s md.tpr -o cluster1.gro -e 600000 -pbc cluster
Fine, you get a cluster
> 3- trjconv -f cluster1.gro -s md.tpr -dump 150 -o cluster2.gro
This does nothing special. Just because you have a reference clustered
doesn't mean the output frame will turn out clustered.
> 4- grompp -f md.mdp -c cluster2.gro -o cluster1.tpr -n index.ndx
> 5- trjconv -f cluster1.gro -o cluster1.xtc -s cluster1.tpr -pbc nojump
This screws up everything. You can only use -pbc nojump with a
reference structure that is sufficiently close to the first frame of
the trajectory. Your reference is a snapshot at t=600 ns.
> 6- trjconv -f cluster1.xtc -s cluster1.tpr -pbc mol -ur compact -center -o
> cluster3.xtc
This would probably be
fine if the trajectory was okay there.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
--
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
post-doctoral researcher
Molecular Dynamics Group
* Groningen Institute for Biomolecular Research and Biotechnology
* Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials
University of Groningen
The Netherlands
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/attachments/20111228/d0b386d6/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 01:22:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Zahra M <s_zahra_mous...@yahoo.com>
Subject: [gmx-users] positive potential energy
To: "gmx-users@gromacs.org" <gmx-users@gromacs.org>
Message-ID:
<1325150535.62665.yahoomail...@web161705.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi dear all
I'm simulating a system containing CNT, when I put CNT in a unit cell and want
to run energy minimization in a vacuum, I encounter with such an error: "The
optimal PME mesh load for parallel simulations is below 0.5 and
for highly parallel simulations between 0.25 and 0.33, for higher
performance, increase the cut-off and the PME grid spacing", after running
grompp. I've tried a lot of numbers for cut-off radius ,but I didn't get any
result, at last I changed the coulomb type from PME to Cut-off, and it worked,
I want to know if my
results will be reasonable in this case or not, and how to solve that error.
thank you in advanced
Bests
-Zahra
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/attachments/20111229/d842ec1a/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 01:24:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Zahra M <s_zahra_mous...@yahoo.com>
Subject: [gmx-users] Re: positive potential energy
To: "gmx-users@gromacs.org" <gmx-users@gromacs.org>
Message-ID:
<1325150654.64323.yahoomail...@web161705.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sorry ...I forget to announce that my potential energy is positive, is it
logical?
________________________________
From: Zahra M <s_zahra_mous...@yahoo.com>
To: "gmx-users@gromacs.org" <gmx-users@gromacs.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 12:52 PM
Subject: positive potential
energy
Hi dear all
I'm simulating a system containing CNT, when I put CNT in a unit cell and want
to run energy minimization in a vacuum, I encounter with such an error: "The
optimal PME mesh load for parallel simulations is below 0.5 and
for highly parallel simulations between 0.25 and 0.33, for higher
performance, increase the cut-off and the PME grid spacing", after running
grompp. I've tried a lot of numbers for cut-off radius ,but I didn't get any
result, at last I changed the coulomb type from PME to Cut-off, and it worked,
I want to know if my results will be reasonable in this case or not, and how to
solve that error.
thank you in advanced
Bests
-Zahra
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/attachments/20111229/9a81cf29/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:34:59 +1100
From: Mark Abraham <mark.abra...@anu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Re: positive potential energy
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users@gromacs.org>
Message-ID: <4efc3443.8060...@anu.edu.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
On 29/12/2011 8:24 PM, Zahra M wrote:
> Sorry ...I forget to announce that my potential energy is positive, is
> it logical?
No.
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Zahra M <s_zahra_mous...@yahoo.com>
> *To:* "gmx-users@gromacs.org" <gmx-users@gromacs.org>
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 29, 2011 12:52 PM
> *Subject:* positive potential energy
>
> Hi dear all
> I'm simulating a system containing CNT, when I put CNT in a unit cell
> and want to run energy minimization in a vacuum, I encounter with such
> an error: "The optimal PME mesh load for parallel simulations is below
> 0.5 and for highly parallel simulations between 0.25 and 0.33, for
> higher performance, increase the cut-off and the
PME grid spacing",
> after running grompp. I've tried a lot of numbers for cut-off radius
> ,but I didn't get any result, at last I changed the coulomb type from
> PME to Cut-off, and it worked, I want to know if my results will be
> reasonable in this case or not, and how to solve that error.
It's not an error, but an advisory about your performance, and doesn't
matter for EM in vacuo which will only run for a few seconds. Using a
plain cut-off is unreasonable by definition, but doesn't matter for EM
in vacuo. Otherwise, you should note that the suggestion is to "increase
the cut-off *and* the PME grid spacing," not just one of them.
Mark
Hi dear Mark
Thank you for your quick response.
I increased both of the grid spacing and cut-off, and it worked.
thank you very much...
-Zahra
> thank you in advanced
> Bests
>
> -Zahra
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/attachments/20111229/1a11eb72/attachment.html
------------------------------
--
gmx-users mailing list
gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
End of gmx-users Digest, Vol 92, Issue 138
******************************************
--
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
