Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file

2012-08-14 Thread rama david
Hi Juliette , If your data is more and because of that may be -append not support you. Then these may be help you .. mdrun -v -deffnm use different name than previous -s your tpr file -cpi cpt See carefully the output and check the time at which the run start..Is the starting time

[gmx-users] checkpoint file

2012-08-13 Thread Juliette N.
Hello all, I am going to restart my crashed simulations, but I am not sure which of *_prev.cpt or *.cpt to use as they contain different written frames. *_prev.cpt Last frame -1 time 7462.900 *.cptLast frame -1 time 7468.965 Also on the gmx site it is stated

Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file

2012-08-13 Thread Matthias Ernst
Long story short: backup everything (since it's a backup, and hopefully you won't need it), then use the [whatever].cpt file. You don't want to do work twice, do you? If you use the [whatever]_prev.cpi file, you will calculate some frames *again* that are already there. If you use an up-to-date

Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file

2012-08-13 Thread Juliette N.
Thank you. I am using mpirun -np 8 mdrun_mpi -deffnm md -s -o -c -g -e -x -cpi md_prev.cpt but I dont get any output and the issued command terminates in the terminal. Do I have to remove the -o -c -g -e -x flags from the command line? Appreciate your help, On 13 August 2012 15:28,

Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file

2012-08-13 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 8/13/12 3:42 PM, Juliette N. wrote: Thank you. I am using mpirun -np 8 mdrun_mpi -deffnm md -s -o -c -g -e -x -cpi md_prev.cpt but I dont get any output and the issued command terminates in the terminal. Normally error messages are rather obvious. Check your .log file carefully or

Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file

2012-08-13 Thread Matthias Ernst
Am 13.08.2012 21:42, schrieb Juliette N.: Thank you. I am using mpirun -np 8 mdrun_mpi -deffnm md -s -o -c -g -e -x -cpi md_prev.cpt I see a md_prev.cpt. If I presume correctly that this is for the continuation of the crashed run: Why and did you read what I wrote? but I dont get any

Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file

2012-08-13 Thread Juliette N.
Yes this is to continue a crashed run, but I dont know why my runs crash at the very beginnig of the simulation. I am using 4.5.4 so -append should work by default. I tried a simulation from time zero and it works as before ( mpirun -np 8 mdrun_mpi -deffnm md -s -o -c -g -e -x ) but as soon as I

Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file

2012-08-13 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 8/13/12 4:08 PM, Juliette N. wrote: Yes this is to continue a crashed run, but I dont know why my runs crash at the very beginnig of the simulation. I am using 4.5.4 so -append should work by default. I tried a simulation from time zero and it works as before ( mpirun -np 8 mdrun_mpi

Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file

2012-08-13 Thread Juliette N.
Sorry Justin, but I dont see whats happening... Do I have to remove mpi or -np from the line while using -cpi *.cpt ? mdrun -deffnm md -s -o -c -g -e -x -cpi output Thanks! On 13 August 2012 16:10, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: On 8/13/12 4:08 PM, Juliette N. wrote: Yes this is

Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file

2012-08-13 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 8/13/12 4:16 PM, Juliette N. wrote: Sorry Justin, but I dont see whats happening... Do I have to remove mpi or -np from the line while using -cpi *.cpt ? No, you don't. All you should need (provided the .cpt file is valid, which it appears to be from the gmxcheck output from before)

Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file

2012-08-13 Thread Juliette N.
I am using the same line, but it crashes...Is that because my trr files is big that it cand append the files? It was ~ 40 GB when crash happened... I am using 4.5.4. I tried both with and without -append. On 13 August 2012 16:19, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: On 8/13/12 4:16 PM,

Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file

2012-08-13 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 8/13/12 4:34 PM, Juliette N. wrote: I am using the same line, but it crashes...Is that because my trr files is big that it cand append the files? It was ~ 40 GB when crash happened... I am using 4.5.4. I tried both with and without -append. If it fails with and without the -append

Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file

2012-08-13 Thread Juliette N.
Thanks, maybe I should re start ... :( On 13 August 2012 16:36, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: On 8/13/12 4:34 PM, Juliette N. wrote: I am using the same line, but it crashes...Is that because my trr files is big that it cand append the files? It was ~ 40 GB when crash happened...

Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file

2012-08-13 Thread Juliette N.
Hi all, My cpt file doesnt contain any information?!! gmxcheck -f md.cpt gives the following: Checking file md.cpt # Atoms 20688 Last frame -1 time 7468.965 Item#frames Timestep (ps) Step 1 Time 1 Lambda 1 Coords 1

Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file

2012-08-13 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 8/13/12 4:54 PM, Juliette N. wrote: Hi all, My cpt file doesnt contain any information?!! Sure it does. gmxcheck -f md.cpt gives the following: Checking file md.cpt # Atoms 20688 Last frame -1 time 7468.965 Item#frames Timestep (ps) Step 1

Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file

2012-08-13 Thread Juliette N.
All right, but I was expecting some more information reflecting the last state of the system, e.g, velocities... Thank you, On 13 August 2012 17:04, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: On 8/13/12 4:54 PM, Juliette N. wrote: Hi all, My cpt file doesnt contain any information?!! Sure

Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file

2012-08-13 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 8/13/12 5:10 PM, Juliette N. wrote: All right, but I was expecting some more information reflecting the last state of the system, e.g, velocities... gmxcheck verifies the integrity of the file. gmxdump will produce more detailed information, not that it's of any particular use in this

Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file

2012-08-13 Thread Mark Abraham
On 14/08/2012 6:08 AM, Juliette N. wrote: Yes this is to continue a crashed run, but I dont know why my runs crash at the very beginnig of the simulation. You have to look at the stderr, stdout and .log file for information. You can't solve the problem without that. Mark I am using

[gmx-users] checkpoint file and *.gro -- energy calculation

2010-11-13 Thread Yongchul Chung
Hello gmx-users, I ran two short simulation in series (simulation A -- simulation B). The output *.gro file from the simulation A was used as an input file for the simulation B. If I compare the energy value at the end of simulation A, and t=0 at simulation B, they are different (0.1% deviation).

[gmx-users] checkpoint file and *.gro -- energy calculation

2010-11-13 Thread Yongchul Chung
Hello gmx-users, I ran two short simulation in series (simulation A -- simulation B). The output *.gro file from the simulation A was used as an input file for the simulation B. If I compare the energy value at the end of simulation A, and t=0 at simulation B, they are different (0.1% deviation).

Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file and *.gro -- energy calculation

2010-11-13 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Yongchul Chung wrote: Hello gmx-users, I ran two short simulation in series (simulation A -- simulation B). The output *.gro file from the simulation A was used as an input file for the simulation B. If I compare the energy value at the end of simulation A, and t=0 at simulation B, they

Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file and *.gro -- energy calculation

2010-11-13 Thread Yongchul Chung
Thanks Justin for your prompt reply. I am aware of the link you provided, but it seems they are rather hand-waving. It would be nice if I could be directed to a source code of some sort. Greg On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: Yongchul Chung wrote:

Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file and *.gro -- energy calculation

2010-11-13 Thread Yongchul Chung
Forgot to mention that I am using gromacs 4.0.3 with N=19200 Greg On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Yongchul Chung yxc...@case.edu wrote: Thanks Justin for your prompt reply. I am aware of the link you provided, but it seems they are rather hand-waving. It would be nice if I could be

Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file and *.gro -- energy calculation

2010-11-13 Thread Mark Abraham
On 14/11/2010 4:06 AM, Yongchul Chung wrote: Thanks Justin for your prompt reply. I am aware of the link you provided, but it seems they are rather hand-waving. It would be nice if I could be directed to a source code of some sort. They're hand-waving by design of course - a normal user

Re: [gmx-users] checkpoint file and *.gro -- energy calculation

2010-11-13 Thread Yongchul Chung
Thanks, Mark. Greg On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.auwrote: On 14/11/2010 4:06 AM, Yongchul Chung wrote: Thanks Justin for your prompt reply. I am aware of the link you provided, but it seems they are rather hand-waving. It would be nice if I could be