Re: [gmx-users] Re: Segmentation Fault using g_cluster

2013-09-06 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Evelyne,

I haven't got a clue... But does it work if you use -settime when
concatenating the trajectories, to avoid having frames with the same time
index? It shouldn't cause a segfault, but it might.

Cheers,

Tsjerk


On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 7:20 AM, deplazes e.depla...@uq.edu.au wrote:

 Hi guys

 do you have an idea what is causing the segmentation fault with g_cluster?


 I do the following

 1 . I combine trr files from different simulations using trjcat and select
 backbone atoms only

 trjcat  -f ../../*C/runs/*/*trr -cat -n index.ndx -o trajout_combined.xtc

 2. I make a new .tpr file for the backbone atoms only

 tpbconv -s run_1.tpr -nsteps -1 -n index.ndx -o topol.tpr

 3. I run g_cluster on the combined trajout with the new tpr selecting
 backbone for RMSD fit and output

 g_cluster -f trajout_combined.xtc -n index.ndx -s topol.tpr -fit -method
 gromos -sz clust-size_0.20.xvg -o rmsd-clust_0.20.xpm -g cluster_0.20.log
 -clid clust-id_0.20.xvg  -cl clusters_0.20.pdb -dist rmsd-dist_0.20.xvg
 -cutoff 0.20

 the output is

 Allocated 12066120 bytes for frames
 Read 1202 frames from trajectory trajout_combined.xtc
 Computing 1202x1202 RMS deviation matrix
 # RMSD calculations left: 0

 The RMSD ranges from 0.0601062 to 0.533457 nm
 Average RMSD is 0.321503
 Number of structures for matrix 1202
 Energy of the matrix is 160.564 nm
 WARNING: rmsd minimum 0 is below lowest rmsd value 0.0601062
 Making list of neighbors within cutoff 100%
 Finding clusters7

 Found 7 clusters

 Writing middle structure for each cluster to clusters_0.20.pdb
 Segmentation fault


 I have tried using less frames (using -dt 500 for trjcat) as to check that
 it is not a memory issue but still get the seg fault

 The g_cluster works if I use a trajectory from a single simulations but not
 for hte combined trajout.

 I am getting a segmentation fault with both gromacs 4.5.5 (on my macbook
 pro) and 4.6.3 on raijin.nci.org.au (our supercomputing facilities in
 Australia)

 Cheers
 Evelyne



 --
 View this message in context:
 http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Segmentation-Fault-using-g-cluster-tp4662864p5011007.html
 Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists




-- 
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Re: Segmentation Fault using g_cluster

2013-09-06 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Evelyne,

So I was reading carelessly... I didn't notice you used an index file with
trjcat. If you later try to use the same index file, that may indeed cause
a segfault. Good that it works now.

Cheers,

Tsjerk


On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:29 PM, deplazes e.depla...@uq.edu.au wrote:

 You also need to make a new index file that corresponds to the new ,
 reduced .tpr file
 Cheers
 E

 Enjoy Ausserberg

 From: Tsjerk Wassenaar [via GROMACS] 
 ml-node+s5086n5011009...@n6.nabble.commailto:
 ml-node+s5086n5011009...@n6.nabble.com
 Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 02:12:25 -0700
 To: Evelyne Deplazes e.depla...@uq.edu.aumailto:e.depla...@uq.edu.au
 Subject: Re: Segmentation Fault using g_cluster

 Hi Evelyne,

 I haven't got a clue... But does it work if you use -settime when
 concatenating the trajectories, to avoid having frames with the same time
 index? It shouldn't cause a segfault, but it might.

 Cheers,

 Tsjerk


 On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 7:20 AM, deplazes [hidden
 email]/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=5011009i=0 wrote:

  Hi guys
 
  do you have an idea what is causing the segmentation fault with
 g_cluster?
 
 
  I do the following
 
  1 . I combine trr files from different simulations using trjcat and
 select
  backbone atoms only
 
  trjcat  -f ../../*C/runs/*/*trr -cat -n index.ndx -o trajout_combined.xtc
 
  2. I make a new .tpr file for the backbone atoms only
 
  tpbconv -s run_1.tpr -nsteps -1 -n index.ndx -o topol.tpr
 
  3. I run g_cluster on the combined trajout with the new tpr selecting
  backbone for RMSD fit and output
 
  g_cluster -f trajout_combined.xtc -n index.ndx -s topol.tpr -fit -method
  gromos -sz clust-size_0.20.xvg -o rmsd-clust_0.20.xpm -g cluster_0.20.log
  -clid clust-id_0.20.xvg  -cl clusters_0.20.pdb -dist rmsd-dist_0.20.xvg
  -cutoff 0.20
 
  the output is
 
  Allocated 12066120 bytes for frames
  Read 1202 frames from trajectory trajout_combined.xtc
  Computing 1202x1202 RMS deviation matrix
  # RMSD calculations left: 0
 
  The RMSD ranges from 0.0601062 to 0.533457 nm
  Average RMSD is 0.321503
  Number of structures for matrix 1202
  Energy of the matrix is 160.564 nm
  WARNING: rmsd minimum 0 is below lowest rmsd value 0.0601062
  Making list of neighbors within cutoff 100%
  Finding clusters7
 
  Found 7 clusters
 
  Writing middle structure for each cluster to clusters_0.20.pdb
  Segmentation fault
 
 
  I have tried using less frames (using -dt 500 for trjcat) as to check
 that
  it is not a memory issue but still get the seg fault
 
  The g_cluster works if I use a trajectory from a single simulations but
 not
  for hte combined trajout.
 
  I am getting a segmentation fault with both gromacs 4.5.5 (on my macbook
  pro) and 4.6.3 on raijin.nci.org.au (our supercomputing facilities in
  Australia)
 
  Cheers
  Evelyne
 
 
 
  --
  View this message in context:
 
 http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Segmentation-Fault-using-g-cluster-tp4662864p5011007.html
  Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
  --
  gmx-users mailing list[hidden
 email]/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=5011009i=1
  http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
  * Please search the archive at
  http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
  * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
  www interface or send it to [hidden
 email]/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=5011009i=2.
  * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 



 --
 Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
 --
 gmx-users mailing list[hidden
 email]/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=5011009i=3
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to [hidden
 email]/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=5011009i=4.
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


 
 If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
 below:

 http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Segmentation-Fault-using-g-cluster-tp4662864p5011009.html
 To unsubscribe from Segmentation Fault using g_cluster, click here
 http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=4662864code=ZS5kZXBsYXplc0B1cS5lZHUuYXV8NDY2Mjg2NHwxMjE4ODYwNzUz
 .
 NAML
 http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewerid=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.namlbase=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespacebreadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
 




 --
 View this message in context:
 http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Segmentation-Fault-using-g-cluster-tp4662864p5011012.html
 Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive