> string_table::key
> -string_table::find(const std::string& to_find, bool insert_unfound,
> - bool case_insensitive)
> +string_table::find(const std::string& t_f, bool insert_unfound)
> {
> - std::size_t ckey = 0;
> + std::string t_fcase;
> + const std::string *to_find =
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 04:48:17PM +0800, zou lunkai wrote:
> FYI, misc-ming.all/case.as, line 212: xcheck_equals(propRecorder[0], 'A')
> That check fails because variable 'A' was converted to lower case at
> definition time(right?) at swf version lower than 7.
Correct. We discussed a more corre
> > Add case-insensitive support for string_table. More work is needed to
> > enable it where appropriate.
>
> A suggestion could be not make sensitive-insensitive a per-call setting
> but a permanent setting in string_table.
> Currently, the only call to lower_next_group is at initiali
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 03:41:59AM +, Chad Musick wrote:
> CVSROOT: /sources/gnash
> Module name: gnash
> Changes by: Chad Musick08/01/24 03:41:59
>
> Modified files:
> . : ChangeLog
> libbase: string_table.cpp string_table.h
> server
> -- Is the property in B completely masked, or only for Setter?
C = new Object();
B = new Object(); B.__proto__ = C;
A = new Object(); A.__proto__ = B;
mGetter = function() {
return this._m
};
mSetter = function (x) {
check(this == _root.A);
};
B.m = 100;
C.addProperty("m", mGet
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 12:26:39AM +0900, Chad Musick wrote:
> What is the result of the following change to the code?
>
> mGetter = function() {
> check(this == _root.A);
> };
>
> ...
>
> d:Number = A.m
>
>
> -- Is the property in B completely masked, or only for Setter?
My experience
What is the result of the following change to the code?
mGetter = function() {
check(this == _root.A);
};
...
d:Number = A.m
-- Is the property in B completely masked, or only for Setter?
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 10:36 +0800, zou lunkai wrote:
> > > class A : B : C
> > >
> > > C.m
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 07:11:55AM +0900, Chad Musick wrote:
> > Chad, it seems this change broke something, see my new test in
> > actionscript.all/Object.as
> >
> > This is the problem:
> >
> > class A : B : C
> >
> > C.m is a getter-setter
> > B.m is a normal property
> > A.m doe
> > class A : B : C
> >
> > C.m is a getter-setter
> > B.m is a normal property
> > A.m doesn't exist
> >
> > When setting A.m, the getter-setter should be invoked.
Tried the above tests, confrimed that the setter should be invoked.
See testing code below:
C = new Object();
B =
> Chad, it seems this change broke something, see my new test in
> actionscript.all/Object.as
>
> This is the problem:
>
> class A : B : C
>
> C.m is a getter-setter
> B.m is a normal property
> A.m doesn't exist
>
> When setting A.m, the getter-setter should be invoked.
> fi
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 07:39:41PM +0200, strk wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:47:57AM +, Chad Musick wrote:
>
> > http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/gnash/server/as_object.cpp?cvsroot=gnash&r1=1.68&r2=1.69
>
>
> > - // found a getter/setter property in the inheritance chain
> > - /
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:47:57AM +, Chad Musick wrote:
> http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/gnash/server/as_object.cpp?cvsroot=gnash&r1=1.68&r2=1.69
> - // found a getter/setter property in the inheritance chain
> - // so set that and return
> - Property* prop = findGetterSett
Did you run ./autogen.sh ? This was removed from Makefiles.
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 15:20 +0200, Udo Giacomozzi wrote:
> Hello Chad,
>
> Thursday, October 18, 2007, 1:47:57 PM, you wrote:
> CM> Removed files:
> CM> server : GetterSetter.cpp GetterSetter.h
> CM> testsuite/se
Hello Chad,
Thursday, October 18, 2007, 1:47:57 PM, you wrote:
CM> Removed files:
CM> server : GetterSetter.cpp GetterSetter.h
CM> testsuite/server: GetterSetterTest.cpp
Build fails now:
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/indunet/gnash-pc104/gnash/server'
make[3]: *** N
14 matches
Mail list logo
