Re: [Gnewsense-dev] mesa 7.0.3 rc2 - some files licenses

2009-11-24 Thread Karl Goetz
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:04:19 +0100 Sam Geeraerts sam...@elmundolibre.be wrote: Robert Millan schreef: Oh, I missunderstood. Then I guess someone should file a bug in Debian? Probably. Let's see what FSF have to say about it first. Karl also contacted FOSSology to see if any other code

Re: [Gnewsense-dev] mesa 7.0.3 rc2 - some files licenses

2009-11-23 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Robert Millan schreef: Oh, I missunderstood. Then I guess someone should file a bug in Debian? Probably. Let's see what FSF have to say about it first. Karl also contacted FOSSology to see if any other code has a similar issue. Please don't get the impression that Debian ignores all

Re: [Gnewsense-dev] mesa 7.0.3 rc2 - some files licenses

2009-11-22 Thread ben
I recently made an effort to get some other of Kilgard's code relicensed [1]. Kilgard was not very helpful, unfortunately. (I wouldn't have bothered contacting him if i had read [2] before.) ben [1] http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00362 [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=131997

Re: [Gnewsense-dev] mesa 7.0.3 rc2 - some files licenses

2009-11-22 Thread ben
Karl Goetz wrote: * Changed the notice in debian/copyright regarding the right to distribute modified binaries, now blessed by Mark Just Because I'm A CG Genius Doesn't Mean I'm Not A Stubborn Arsehole Kilgard. (Closes: #131997) I wonder if this means we can also distribute glut