On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:28:53 +0200
Benedikt Ahrens benedikt.ahr...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
the last contact to AMS mentioned in Debian's bug report in order to
get clarification was quite some time ago. I'll contact the AMS in
order to get some news.
Removal of amslatex would result in a
Karl Goetz schreef:
HI all,
Would one of the tex users like to hack on texlive-base?
gNS bug report: http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00248
Upstream bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=477060
I suspect its much the same level effort as the texlive-generic-extra
package.
I
Karl Goetz schreef:
Cool. Not having app-install-data-commercial hangs the installer when
trying to install third party applications, but they're mostly
non-free applications, so we shouldn't have that list anyway. Hence
http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00309.
This appears to be a hang over
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:24:56 +0200
Sam Geeraerts sam...@elmundolibre.be wrote:
Karl Goetz schreef:
Cool. Not having app-install-data-commercial hangs the installer
when trying to install third party applications, but they're mostly
non-free applications, so we shouldn't have that list
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:51:04 +0200
Sam Geeraerts sam...@elmundolibre.be wrote:
Karl Goetz schreef:
HI all,
Would one of the tex users like to hack on texlive-base?
gNS bug report: http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00248
Upstream bug:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I haven't had any answer from the AMS yet. Later today I'll contact the
Debian maintainer for some news.
ben
Karl Goetz wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:51:04 +0200
Sam Geeraerts sam...@elmundolibre.be wrote:
Karl Goetz schreef:
HI all,
Would
