In the meanwhile, Iceweasel/Firefox is not a better option than Icecat. One reason to IceCat lacks of developers/contributors is the lack of distribution to users.
El 09/08/17 a les 22:42, Sam Geeraerts ha escrit: > Op Wed, 9 Aug 2017 09:55:42 +0200 > schreef Narcis Garcia <informat...@actiu.net>: > >> Here is the information concerning to this proposal: >> https://bugs.debian.org/637348 >> >> GuixSD, Parabola and Trisquel already include IceCat in their >> repositories. > > It makes a lot of sense for a free distro to include IceCat. And I must > admit that our Iceweasel is not in the state I would like it to be. But > I unsubscribed from Gnuzilla's mailing list a few months ago because I > got really tired of all the complaints, demands and rants without much > constructive contributions coming in. I think a discussion about what > we want a browser for a free distro to look like is needed and it's > also a continuous evaluation, but the IceCat community does/did not > seem to be welcoming to that. > > So I'm currently not looking at IceCat. I might check it out again in > some time, hopefully getting a more positive impression then. > > _______________________________________________ > gNewSense-users mailing list > gNewSense-users@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users > _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list gNewSense-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
