On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 03:56, Derek D. Martin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
For all of the above reasons, I argue both that PGP signatures do add
value to a message, and that there is absolutely no comparison between
a PGP signature and any of the aforementioned
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Additionally, Pegasus for Windows supports PGP although I have not yet
installed it.
Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
I would like to add another reason. I have yet to hear of a security
vulnerability cased
Since we can't convince you GPG guyz :-)
.procmailrc:
:0 Bf
* -BEGIN PGP
| pgp_clean
pgp_clean:
#!/bin/sh -- # A comment mentioning perl
eval 'exec perl -S $0 ${1+$@}'
if 0;
while () { $msg .= $_ }
$msg =~ s/-BEGIN PGP SIGNED(.|\n)*?Hash:.*\n\n//;
$msg =~ s/-BEGIN PGP
