*sigh*
I've avoided getting any wireless hardware for various reasons. Now
I'm in a situation where my life is much easier if I dive in.
Well, I'm part way there. I've at least got a wireless card that
works with the access point (whatever it is) that I need it to. But
having a piece of
Is there in fact a MELBA meeting on Wednesday night? I understand that
there was something last week but then there was some talk of another
meeting this week?
Thanks,
Erik
--
Erik Price
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, at 12:09am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Below is a snippet from an ethereal dump. Any ideas?
Shutdown everything. Place system on an isolated network. Start packet
sniffer (no filter). Start any services Apache depends on (e.g., a local
DNS resolver). Start Apache. Sen
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, at 7:24pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I found this site today and have been going through it since:
>
> http://www.empowermentzone.com/
Oh my God! It's full of hyperlinks!
;-)
--
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, at 8:15am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was wondering what are the latest features I should look for and what
> brands/models other people are using successfully, or more importantly
> unsucessfully to connect to attbi.
DOCSIS (Data Over Cable System Interface Specification
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, at 2:29pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Any suggestions as to what projects or vendors I might read up on?
Given the multi-terabyte size requirement, you might want to look into
some "Big Name Vendors" like Red Hat or IBM. They have the resources to
have tested this already.
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, at 3:16pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>... while LVM and the ext2 resize tool requires the filesystem
> be offline.
FYI, ext2 can be grown while online using a kernel patch. You need to
take it offline to shrink it.
Same story for ResierFS, except no patching needed othe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, [EMAIL PROTECTED] hath spake thusly:
> Except that telnet://server isn't a mime type, it's a URL, which is
> different. Mime types are used for handling attachements, URLs are
> for protocols.
I'm aware of that... the poi
I found this site today and have been going through it
since:
http://www.empowermentzone.com/
There is so much information on here, it is going to take
quite a while to go through. I hope everyone finds it as
interesting as I do.
Regards,
Jeff Kirkland
Just finished building one, actually a few of them.
Started with a base of the IBM xSeries (360). Got it loaded with
their RAID controllers, and also got the expansion chassis for
the drives. The cost wasn't that high, but we get educational
pricing from IBM. We also buy a LOT of stuff from th
At some point tonight (probably after 9pm), I'll be updating mailman to
2.0.13. This is to close some security holes and (hopefully) fix some
bugs. Note that this new release does NOT include the virtual domain
fixes.
The upgrade entails turning off all the mail software (even sendmail)
while the
In a message dated: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:29:49 EDT
"Andrew W. Gaunt" said:
>I'm in the very preliminary stages of looking into the
>possibilty of replacing a proprietary file server we have
>that is rather expensive and difficult to work with.
Are you replacing a NAS system?
>Without going into
I'm in the very preliminary stages of looking into the
possibilty of replacing a proprietary file server we have
that is rather expensive and difficult to work with.
Without going into too much detail, its replacement must
be able to deliver data via NFS and SMB. Samba is just fine
for the latte
Ken Ambrose wrote:
> I'm sorry -- I wasn't explicit enough. The "boxen" I upgraded -were-
> the servers. The clients are many, and varied, but seem to all
> experience the same issue. Note that of the clients from whom I've
> heard complaints, all are behind NAT boxes, though I don't quite see
In a message dated: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 23:59:51 EDT
"Derek D. Martin" said:
>When I try this in Mozilla 1.0, it tells me that telnet is not a
>registered protocol. It may well be that (at least the linux version
>of) mozilla does not support this.
I get the same result with Galeon, which is mozi
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Ken Ambrose wrote:
=>Howdy, all. I just upgraded my boxen to RH 7.3, and suddenly my webmail
=>(SquirrelMail) is taking three minutes just to bring up the login page. I
=>double-checked my httpd.conf file, and HostnameLookups is set to off, so I
=>don't -think- it's a rever
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Ken Ambrose wrote:
> Howdy, all. I just upgraded my boxen to RH 7.3, and suddenly my webmail
> (SquirrelMail) is taking three minutes just to bring up the login page. I
> double-checked my httpd.conf file, and HostnameLookups is set to off, so I
> don't -think- it's a revers
I'm sorry -- I wasn't explicit enough. The "boxen" I upgraded -were- the
servers. The clients are many, and varied, but seem to all experience the
same issue. Note that of the clients from whom I've heard complaints, all
are behind NAT boxes, though I don't quite see how that would correlate.
(
On Monday, August 26, 2002, at 03:09 AM, Ken Ambrose wrote:
> Howdy, all. I just upgraded my boxen to RH 7.3, and suddenly my webmail
> (SquirrelMail) is taking three minutes just to bring up the login
> page. I
> double-checked my httpd.conf file, and HostnameLookups is set to off,
> so I
19 matches
Mail list logo
