No, No, No!
Eric raised his hand (meaning he had a projector) and I got a couple of people
who answered back just to me that they were interested.
I will go ahead and do thisbut we need to know if we have the second floor
room, or if we have to project on the back of the restaurant booth we
On Wednesday, August 28, 2002, at 12:53 AM, Erik Price wrote:
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 14:06, Jon Hall wrote:
I could give my talk about the new things in the V2.5 kernel and
what they
mean to systems admins and programmers, if anyone would be
interested. I should
warn you that to do it
Erik,
I did not mean to scare you off.I realized later it was someone else who
siad they might be able to get the projector.
I am going to do the talk even without the projectorit is no biggie, just
nicer to have something to look at besides my face.
And Rob, this talk never made it
The other good reason for waiting for 802.11g is that the 802.11b standard
has a very weak WEP implementation and I believe the g standard will correct
that. What I know about the 802.11b standard is that there are two WEP
encryption levels, 64 and 128 bit (actually less because there is a 24 bit
In a message dated: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:45:14 EDT
Jon Hall said:
but we need to know if we have the second floor
room, or if we have to project on the back of the restaurant booth we sit in.
I'll be calling this afternoon to check on the room. Chris is the
only one authorized to manage that
Ken Ambrose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Prolly wanna pipe the output to
less, or your favorite pager...
...or port it to a real shell, like sh... (-:
--kevin
--
The C shell is flakier than a snowstorm.
-- Guy Harris
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing
On Wednesday, August 28, 2002, at 05:36 PM, Ken Ambrose wrote:
Too darn lazy to fire up the browser?
Then enjoy the below script, for all you command-line guys (and
gal(s))...
Nice script. If you like writing shell scripts to do little jobs like
this (and there's plenty of ways to
