On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, at 3:49pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just issued a wireless card at work ... I want this thing to work
under Linux. Any ideas?
The iwconfig(8) command lets you fiddle with the wireless parameters. It
is part of the wireless-tools package on my Red Hat 7.3 system,
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, at 8:12am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Windows XP Shows the Direction Microsoft is Going.
http://www.hevanet.com/peace/microsoft.htm
It's long, illuminating, and thought-provoking. One almost can't
believe that it's all true.
It should be understood that the article in
In a message dated: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 08:43:30 EST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Ask your network dudes:
- Are they using 802.11b, 802.11a, 802.11g, or Something Else(TM). I'm
pretty sure the card you describe is 11b only, but let's be sure.
11b.
- What is the SSID?
Don't know, they
- Are you using WEP (Worthless Encryption Protocol, AKA Wireless
Equivalent Privacy)? If so, what is the key?
Yes, and see above :(
Well, if WEP was any good, that would be a problem. Fortunately,
however,
WEP sucks. Get the right software, and you should be able to crack the key
in
In a message dated: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:24:25 EST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, at 11:07am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It really depends on the version of WEP.. Cisco has WEP with some of it's
own stuff and that makes it work rather well ...
Yah, basically, Cisco has an
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And speaking of Cisco and Wireless, /. just posted a story stating
that Cisco is about to by Linksys for ~$500M !
And amazingly - my WAP just stopped working... coincidence?!
--
A Jade stone is useless before it is processed; a man is
Wonderful. A pro-war song that completely misses the point, and
tries to connect the war we've just begin to the 9/11 attack on
the WTC. I'd like to believe that you posted this crap here by
accident, and intended this for another list, but the source address
and OT subject tag make that hard to
So rather then just deleting something he's not interested in and keeping
his mouth shut we'll have a debate about this on the list that will generate
100x more traffic :)
Not that I care, I didn't even listen to the tune.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Since it's an abuse to inflict one's non-Linux-related
views on this captive audience (gathered here because
we value this channel's blessedly high *LINUX-RELATED*
S/N ratio) and since there are eleventy-bazillion
other channels (email lists, blogs, barrooms, etc)
where war-talk *is* welcome,
How 'bout them Linux? Ain't they something?!
Isn't it more correct to call it GNU/Linux, or is that a religous discussion
too?
:)
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, at 2:47pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's an asx file, but the asf file contained within is playable with xine
(and probably with mplayer), though you might need the win32 codecs available
at the mplayer site.
And for those of us who don't have all that crap on our PCs,
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 02:55:46PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, at 2:47pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's an asx file, but the asf file contained within is playable with xine
(and probably with mplayer), though you might need the win32 codecs available
at the mplayer
In a message dated: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:07:56 EST
mike ledoux said:
Wonderful. A pro-war song that completely misses the point, and
tries to connect the war we've just begin to the 9/11 attack on
the WTC. I'd like to believe that you posted this crap here by
accident, and intended this for
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 02:47:30PM -0500, Paul Iadonisi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WARNING: You may love it, or you may hate it. I'm just sick of
Clear Channel's monopoly and want to spread the access
to this song and let people judge for themselves, instead
of
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, mike ledoux wrote:
Wonderful. A pro-war song that completely misses the point, and
tries to connect the war we've just begin to the 9/11 attack on
the WTC. I'd like to believe that you posted this crap here by
accident, and intended this for another list, but the source
Paul Iadonisi wrote:
WARNING: You may love it, or you may hate it. I'm just sick of
Clear Channel's monopoly and want to spread the access
to this song and let people judge for themselves, instead
of allowing the media mogul's to act as faulty filters for
our
Yeah, this is totally offtopic of Linux but I know there are some
helpful hackers on this list and was wondering if anyone wouldn't mind
letting me know if there is a mental trick to working out the results of
bitwise comparison operators.
Do you really have to convert the number to binary and
In a message dated: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:51:34 EST
mike ledoux said:
Look at my history. Off topic posts piss me off, as they defeat my
filters and waste my time.
So why are you not filtering on 'Subject.*[Oo][Tt]\s*:' ?
--
Seeya,
Paul
--
Key fingerprint = 1660 FECC 5D21 D286 F853 E808 BB07
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, at 3:53pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I strongly disagree with the please don't do it again statement. We need
to hear both sides to this so since it is off topic do as you please.
Can we please *NOT* get into a political debate on this list? The only
thing less productive
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, at 4:23pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I strongly disagree with the please don't do it again statement. We
need to hear both sides to this so since it is off topic do as you
please.
Off topic posts are, by their very nature, inappropriate, and don't belong
here. I
I like fudge.
FIREWIRE
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So why are you not filtering on 'Subject.*[Oo][Tt]\s*:' ?
If Mike did this, he would have missed out on Eric Price's [OT] help
w/ bitwise comparison operators thread, which I think is sufficiently
interesting to be discussed on this mailing list.
Regards,
--kevin
--
Kevin D. Clark wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So why are you not filtering on 'Subject.*[Oo][Tt]\s*:' ?
If Mike did this, he would have missed out on Eric Price's [OT] help
w/ bitwise comparison operators thread, which I think is sufficiently
interesting to be discussed on this mailing
As for making sure to hear all sides of anything, listening to
senseless propiganda like this song doesn't usually help with that.
This is part of the reason I make sure to get at least half of my
news from sources outside of the US.
This is one topic that amazes me -- the narrow range of US
24 matches
Mail list logo
