btw, i know there is a jobs list, but i've posted it there twice, and somehow my message got the wrong encoding or content type, and ended up as a bunch of unreadable characters. As a last ditch effor to get the word out, I used a different client and sent to the discuss list -- using the obvious
Open and freely available technology standards are a good thing. They
are especially important to developers of free software. Open standards
create wider interoperability and 'freedom' that free software
developers like. Free and open standards are critically linked to free
and open technol
On 6/7/06, Bill Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that what I need to do is disable NAT and firewall on the Linksys.
Supposedly, this is possible with some LinkSys routers. My WRT54G
v2 with LinkSys firmware 4.20.7 has it under Setup -> Advanced Routing
-> Operating Mode. Setting th
Bill McGonigle is listed as leading the discussion. Ted Roche will be
on the panel.
http://uvcia.org/
(The meeting has not yet made it to the web site.)
UVCIA is the Upper Valley Computer Industry Association. It meets in
West Lebanon on a monthly schedule. Breakfast is served. They will
char
Peg,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> As a side note... I have been a little surprised at how much disk and
> memory I need for a reasonable flavor of Linux... For some reason,
> I'd always thought I'd easily find an interesting Linux that would do as
> much, without requiring so much effort to get
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 05:03:00PM -0400, John Abreau wrote:
> Bill Freeman wrote:
> > The chart that I read showed the V4 to have half as much of each
> > kind of memory as the V3. No other important differences. Or
> > my memory (in my head) may be failing if you have to go back
> > further to
Bill Freeman wrote:
>
> The chart that I read showed the V4 to have half as much of each
> kind of memory as the V3. No other important differences. Or
> my memory (in my head) may be failing if you have to go back
> further to get a full memory WRT54G.
>
Where did you find that chart? The on
>
>
> > I will probably get around to playing with this on one of my
> > personal V4 WRT54GSs, but I'm disinclined to give one of these
> > to the company, given how hard it has been for me to find them.
> > (I'd really like to own a V3, the last max memory model, but I
> > haven't seen one.)
>
Lloyd Kvam offered opinions and advice, thanks.
> Presumably you are controlling the DHCP assignments so that your Name
> Server knows how to resolve names to numbers and DNS is not tied into
> those routers.
The name server here is "Hey, Jim, what's your IP address today", so
it won't have any t
I'm interested to hear that you wish you could own a V3 becausewhen I look at the charts shown here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WRT54G...I don't see important differences between the V3 and V4.Are the charts misleading?
He's probably thinking of the WRT54GS, the memory amounts go down after that
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 12:09 -0400, Bill Freeman wrote:
> Where I'm working we have a Netgear router attached to the DSL modem,
> to which all the wired users are connected, with NAT and DHCP serving
> up 192.168.0.xxx addresses.
>
> One of the things wired to the Netgear is the "internet" port of
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 12:09 -0400, Bill Freeman wrote:
> Where I'm working we have a Netgear router attached to the DSL modem,
> to which all the wired users are connected, with NAT and DHCP serving
> up 192.168.0.xxx addresses.
>
> One of the things wired to the Netgear is the "internet" port of
> I will probably get around to playing with this on one of my
> personal V4 WRT54GSs, but I'm disinclined to give one of these
> to the company, given how hard it has been for me to find them.
> (I'd really like to own a V3, the last max memory model, but I
> haven't seen one.)
I'm interested t
On 6/7/06, Bill Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Where I'm working we have a Netgear router attached to the DSL modem,to which all the wired users are connected, with NAT and DHCP servingup 192.168.0.xxx addresses.One of the things wired to the Netgear is the "internet" port of a
Linksys wireless
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 12:09 pm, Bill Freeman wrote:
> I think that what I need to do is disable NAT and firewall on the Linksys.
> (We would still be protected from the internet by the firewall in the
> Netgear.) If that's possible. Then would I be able to configure the
> Netgear's DHCP serve
> >
> >
> > One of the things wired to the Netgear is the "internet" port of a
> > Linksys wireless-G router (probably too new to install Linux on it),
> > which serves up a wireless network on 192.168.1.xxx.
>
>
>
> I would check the dd-wrt website and see if you can install linux on it, you
>
One of the things wired to the Netgear is the "internet" port of aLinksys wireless-G router (probably too new to install Linux on it),
which serves up a wireless network on 192.168.1.xxx.I would check the dd-wrt website and see if you can install linux on it, you might luck out.What I would do is f
Where I'm working we have a Netgear router attached to the DSL modem,
to which all the wired users are connected, with NAT and DHCP serving
up 192.168.0.xxx addresses.
One of the things wired to the Netgear is the "internet" port of a
Linksys wireless-G router (probably too new to install Linux on
On 6/7/06, Tom Buskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Toshiba P150 I had could only cache 64MB of RAM in the CPU. If you had
more, none of it was cached. However, 80MB, even w/o the cacheing was still
better then 64MB. I think the cache issue is a P150 thing.
It's actually the chipset (north
On Jun 7, 2006, at 8:52 AM, Tom Buskey wrote:
I think Fedora (and OpenOffice) used GCJ to compile alot of the
java apps associated with it. They got a big speedup and
eliminated the need for a JVM for those apps.
On recent installs of OpenOffice, some members of another forum I
hang out
The Toshiba P150 I had could only cache 64MB of RAM in the CPU. If you had more, none of it was cached. However, 80MB, even w/o the cacheing was still better then 64MB. I think the cache issue is a P150 thing.
On 6/6/06, Tech Writer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This old Gateway 2100 Solo laptop do
On 6/6/06, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm mildly curious about things like GCJ (http://gcc.gnu.org/java/),which aim to compile Java-the-language to machine code for the hostplatform (e.g., i386), rather than compiling to machine code for
Java-the-machine. In particular, I'm wondering w
On 6/6/06, Tech Writer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As a side note... I have been a little surprised at how much disk and
memory I need for a reasonable flavor of Linux.
Most Linux distributions tend to keep pace with technology.
Unfortunately, that means their system requirements have risen al
23 matches
Mail list logo
