Thomas Charron wrote:
> Ok, once again, I'm annopyed by a dist. Highly annoyed.
As you and others here may recall, I've been a Mandriva user for a while
now. I caught a lot of flak for using a distro with so much overhead
(it was the first distro to require a whopping 64mb of RAM and a 586
p
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 22:02:26 -0500
From: "Thomas Charron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So which guru is going to tell me which flavor magical pixie dust to
sprinkle where, whilst I waste my time trying to find the solution myself.
Thomas
Guru? Maybe not. But pixie dust? That I mi
Ok, once again, I'm annopyed by a dist. Highly annoyed. emerge kde-meta isn't working for shit. It gets to kopete, which INSISTS on also emerging qt3, which is fine by me, BUT.. kdelibs is linked against fugging qt4, and when kopete tries to emerge, it dies saying it can't run against qt3 whe
Thomas Charron writes:
> Aye, the Intel Core 2 Duo's have 'Advanced Intel Speedstep' capabilities.
> The clock can be dynamically modified by multipliers, I believe up to 8
> different speeds. I'll give you more info as I investigate it, as the
> kernel I built last night I enabled for it.
>
>
I was trying to convince a Windows friend to switch to Thunderbird, but
he decided to upgrade to the new version of Eudora. I was looking at
the new Eudora features and found this press release:
http://www.eudora.com/press/2006/eudora-mozilla_final_10.11.06.html
Larry
___
On 11/03/2006 01:07 PM, Travis Roy wrote:
> Okay, this should be easier, I think I'm doing something wrong.
>
> I'm trying to setup an internal streaming music server in our office.
>
> I want it to take the MP3s from the server and then users can connect
> to that server via XMMS/WinAmp/iTunes and
On 11/3/06, Travis Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want it to take the MP3s from the server and then users can connect
to that server via XMMS/WinAmp/iTunes and listen to tunes.
Why not just use NFS/Samba/whatever and share the files that way?
Why does it have to be "streaming"?
-- Ben
_
I've used Apache::MP3 when i was looking into this for that band I am such
a big fan of. Of course due to bandwidth limitations from my host I
never bothered to try it out for general consumption.
I still had the entry in my httpd.conf under my virtual host (locally, not
on the main server).
On 11/2/06, Dan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes KDE will take awhile, a few hours or so. One benchmark I've done: Not too bad on mine, took me like an hour max.
Compile X on 266Mhz: 8+ hours X took about maybee a half an hour, but that included download times.
Yes compiling will take time,
Aye, the Intel Core 2 Duo's have 'Advanced Intel Speedstep' capabilities. The clock can be dynamically modified by multipliers, I believe up to 8 different speeds. I'll give you more info as I investigate it, as the kernel I built last night I enabled for it.
ThomasOn 11/3/06, Paul Lussier <[
Check out gnump3d. After going through the same iteration that you are
going through, I found it to be exactly what I needed/wanted and it took
literally two minutes to get up and running.
Ed
Travis Roy wrote:
Okay, this should be easier, I think I'm doing something wrong.
I'm trying to set
Okay, this should be easier, I think I'm doing something wrong.
I'm trying to setup an internal streaming music server in our office.
I want it to take the MP3s from the server and then users can connect
to that server via XMMS/WinAmp/iTunes and listen to tunes.
I would like to have differen
On 11/3/06, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone here encountered such a beast?I'd centure to say this is the cpuspeed/cpufreq facility. As far as I know, many distros have this already and load the appropriate modules is one is available for the CPU (well, ok, at least some of the Fe
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:27:39 -0500
"Ben Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also can't help but think, a la Fark and Admiral Ackbar, that
> "It's a trap!". If you look at the history of Microsoft, every
> business "partner" they've ever had has gotten stolen from, ripped
> off, and screwed ove
On 11/3/06, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone here encountered such a beast?
Sure. They've been standard issue on laptops for years. The Intel
brand name is "SpeedStep"; for AMD it is "PowerNow. A Google for
"Linux SpeedStep PowerNow" appears to be promising.
Modern proce
On November 03, 2006, Paul Lussier sent me the following:
> Has anyone here encountered such a beast?
>
> I ran into a discussion on another mailing list, and that was the
> first I had heard about CPUs with variable speed clocks. Does anyone
> know how you muck with these under Linux? I would g
Has anyone here encountered such a beast?
I ran into a discussion on another mailing list, and that was the
first I had heard about CPUs with variable speed clocks. Does anyone
know how you muck with these under Linux? I would guess that there's
some kernel parameter you can toggle to (en|dis)a
Hello Ben,
Actually I don't think that your assessment is far
off. In light of historic events, patent cooperation
sounds like a euphemism for impending lawsuit.
Whenever lawyers posture in coordination with a patent
system that is painfully broken we should expect very
dangerous developments.
> (Alternatively, Microsoft can just keep asking Novell for more and
more money for their patent cooperation, thus turning SuSE Linuxlicense fees into a revenue stream. But I think they prefer thedirect approach.)Could that scenario really happen or am I to naive, or Novell also is?
Cheers,J
On 11/3/06, jimmy Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(Alternatively, Microsoft can just keep asking Novell for more and
more money for their patent cooperation, thus turning SuSE Linux
license fees into a revenue stream. But I think they prefer the
direct approach.)
Could that scenario really
On 11/3/06, jimmy Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2006/nov06/11-02MSNovellPR.mspx
"As part of this agreement, Microsoft will provide a covenant not to
assert its patent rights against customers who have purchased SUSE
Linux Enterprise Server or other c
Yah, Citrix is still in business... but just imagine what their
business would be like if Microsoft hadn't strong-armed the core of
Windows Terminal Services out of them, and the only solution for
Windows remote access was Citrix or some other product.
I'd still put them in the "stolen from"
Greetings,http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2006/nov06/11-02MSNovellPR.mspx
http://www.novell.com/news/press/item.jsp?id=1196How does that sound? Seems that Xen has let GPL down? If anybody could clarify.
Cheers,Jimmy
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing li
On 11/3/06, Tom Buskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the only exception is Citrix. Of course, licensing fees make
Metaframe more expensive then individual systems, but Citrix is still
around.
Yah, Citrix is still in business... but just imagine what their
business would be like if Micros
On 11/2/06, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I also can't help but think, a la Fark and Admiral Ackbar, that
"It's a trap!". If you look at the history of Microsoft, every
business "partner" they've ever had has gotten stolen from, ripped
off, and screwed over. I don't know why this would
Paul Lussier wrote:
You can switch back and forth between any number of clients
As one who's only really used 3 different e-mail clients over a 12-15+
year period, how often do others here switch mail clients? And why?
I find it annoying to switch mail clients since they all have wildly
d
26 matches
Mail list logo
