On Jun 22, 2007, at 17:16, Bruce Dawson wrote:
There are a number of software employees on this list that might
find it
interesting.
I did, but I see them digging their own graves, so I'm not too
worried. If they go under, smarter businesses will replace them.
It does come around to
A client of mine, Windows-centric,computer-phobic (or at least not
-friendly) just wants to be able to access his office network from his
home, whatever magick that requires. The office is on DSL, static IP,
simple network router/firewall, NAT, Windows workgroup, home is also
DSL, likely dynamic
OpenVPN is really, really awesome. Possibly better.
Caveat: Make sure you turn on (config file) the option to check for revoked
certificates, so you don't end up scratching your head trying to figure out
why the cert you revoked is still allowed access.
--DTVZ
On 6/28/07, Ted Roche [EMAIL
On 6/28/07, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A client of mine, Windows-centric,computer-phobic (or at least not
-friendly) just wants to be able to access his office network from his
home, whatever magick that requires. The office is on DSL, static IP,
simple network router/firewall, NAT,
On 6/28/07, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linksys actually sells a VERY nice VPN router which handles both
NATing *AND* active intrusion detection. It also has the horsepower
to actually route gigabit ethernet AND have VPN connections, PLUS it
can actually serve as a 4 port lvl 2
On 6/28/07, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OpenVPN can go over a single TCP socket, which is my preference.
Tunneling TCP/IP over TCP (with or without a VPN) can be a
performance disaster. If the path between the two end points is
perfect (no congestion, no packet loss, acceptable
On 6/28/07, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A client of mine, Windows-centric,computer-phobic (or at least not
-friendly) just wants to be able to access his office network from his
home, whatever magick that requires.
Define access his office network.
After all, it's unlikely your
One thing you'll want to know is that SMB is pretty bad over high
latency links, and certain parts of Windows Explorer and Microsoft
Office absolutely *SUCK* over high latency links.
I have co-workers with laptops they take home and use remotely. They
are always complaining about how
On 6/28/07, Larry Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have co-workers with laptops they take home and use remotely. They
are always complaining about how accessing files is very slow. I, on
the other hand, just use VNC to connect to my desktop and it's as if I'm
right there in the office with
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin D. Clark)
Date: 28 Jun 2007 17:22:22 -0400
From: Joe Redshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [NH Jobs List] Job: Network/Database Administrator - Manchester
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:21:25 -
If you are interested, please e-mail me a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin D. Clark)
Date: 28 Jun 2007 17:22:22 -0400
From: Joe Redshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [NH Jobs List] Job: Network/Database Administrator - Manchester
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:21:25 -
If you are
11 matches
Mail list logo
