On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 16:58 -0400, Ted Roche wrote:
Just checking in to find out if anyone has switched their MythTV setups
over to Schedules Direct [1]? (Schedules Direct is a non-profit
organization that provides raw U.S./Canadian tv listing data to Free and
Open Source Applications. Those
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 23:08 -0400, Stephen Ryan wrote:
What about going the other way around? Try the GUI CD burner - you
should be able to right-click on the .iso and select Write to
Disc
That was my starting point. I glossed over that since there was no
useful error output. The GUI
Dan Jenkins writes:
Does anyone have any recommendations? Preferably with DDR-800 support.
It'll run both Linux and Windows XP 64 and is used for simulations.
Thanks.
You're probably in for a Xeon 5xxx or Opteron 2xx or 2xxx board if you
want this much RAM.
Check Tyan, Supermicro, or for full
On 9/13/07, John Abreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
s/^[\x20\t]*//; # trim leading space
s/[\x20\t]*$//; # trim trailing space
Any particular reason to use [\x20\t] instead of \s ?
\s would also eat newlines and similar. At a minimum, it would have
to explicitly print with \n and use the -n
On Sep 13, 2007, at 07:31, Frank DiPrete wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 16:58 -0400, Ted Roche wrote:
Just checking in to find out if anyone has switched their MythTV
setups
over to Schedules Direct [1]? (Schedules Direct is a non-profit
organization that provides raw U.S./Canadian tv listing
Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sd sign up and confirm: worked
compile mythtv 0.20.2: worked
update from 0.20-svn to 0.20.2: worked
Add sd source to mythtv: flawed
This was not my experience. I just went into my video sources
and converted by TMS
Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Personally, in the proper context, I find this:
When writing code which will be used, looked at, modified, and
maintained by no one else, doing whatever makes you happy and more
efficient makes sense, and is more efficient and expedient.
When writing code
Paul Lussier writes:
(/me waiting for Kevin to pipe in here in 4...3...2...1... ;)
Ben and Paul are competent Perl programmers. They write good code.
Code should be written to be clear. While it is nice if code written
in a given language is understandable by people who don't know the
On 9/13/07, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When writing code which will be used, looked at, modified, and
maintained by a group of people, it is best to agree upon and strictly
adhere to a common set of coding standards.
Yes. But when the designated group of people is all of
On 13 Sep 2007 12:10:58 -0400, Kevin D. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I write anything else, it would just be a combination of me
nit-picking for no purpose and hot air.
Welcome to the Internet! ;-)
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
On 9/13/07, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some reason the problems I seem to run into seem to do not have
an .mc macro defined. :( Sometimes I can find a hint online, but
the community seems to be sparse.
I've long suspected that some people just have bad karma with
certain
On 9/12/07, Tony Lambiris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Three cheers for AMD, who have been leading the way, showing the rest
of the world there is nothing to fear in releasing docs on how your
hardware works (you know, the thing that I paid for and now own). Even
While I'm applauding AMD/ATI,
FYI, a free conference and job fair in Manchester, NH next week.
Register online at http://www.tech-north.com/
Sessions are free, but meals cost extra.
The City of Manchester, New Hampshire is producing the first-ever
Tech-North Summit: an event to be held on Wednesday, September 19, 2007
at
Here's a copy of the press release I cooked up for SFD. Thanks to
Bill Poliquin at GotInk4U(*) it was sent out to ~17,000 e-mail recipients
today. If it isn't raining too hard on Saturday you might want to
stop by(**). Feel free to stop by regardless! And help out if you
wish.
-Bill (and
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 09:44 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Sep 13, 2007, at 07:31, Frank DiPrete wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 16:58 -0400, Ted Roche wrote:
Just checking in to find out if anyone has switched their MythTV
setups
over to Schedules Direct [1]? (Schedules Direct is a
On 9/13/07, Frank DiPrete [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hrm, my experience fetching channels was nothing like that, on both a
0.20.2 test system and an svn trunk system. Are you sure that was
from fetch channel listings from source and not perhaps scan for
channels? Scanning for channels won't
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 16:58 -0400, Ted Roche wrote:
Just checking in to find out if anyone has switched their MythTV setups
over to Schedules Direct [1]? (Schedules Direct is a non-profit
organization that provides raw U.S./Canadian tv listing data to Free and
Open Source Applications. Those
Frank DiPrete wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 16:58 -0400, Ted Roche wrote:
Just checking in to find out if anyone has switched their MythTV setups
over to Schedules Direct [1]? (Schedules Direct is a non-profit
organization that provides raw U.S./Canadian tv listing data to Free and
Open
For all those just tuning in, Ben and I are in violent and vocal
agreement with each other, and at this point are merely quibbling over
semantics :)
Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Er, yes. blah in this case was meta-syntactic, and I was still
thinking of the first example in this
19 matches
Mail list logo
