When: July 15, 2009 7PM (6:30PM for QA)
Topic: Building an open-source PVR (TiVo workalike) with Fedora
Moderator: Jarod Wilson
Location: MIT Building E51, Room 315
Jarod discusses the current state of MythTV, which is expected to
have a new release (MythTV 0.22) shortly before the
Seven people made it to the July meeting of the Monadnock Linux User
Group, MonadLUG, held as usual on the second Thursday of the month at
the SAU #1 offices in Peterborough. (Note that there will be no August
meeting.)
Charlie talked about his job and the many uses they have for some legacy
On July 10, 2009, Dave Johnson sent me the following:
Google has been recording location data of WiFi APs (no surpise
there), too bad the data isn't exported in a friendly way. From what
I can tell, anywhere that has been Street View'ed has also had all
WiFi AP's recorded as the car passed by
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 22:59 -0400, Paul Lussier wrote:
Lloyd Kvam pyt...@venix.com writes:
You've already gotten two useful responses. I'd just like to add that
typically, the object attributes are referenced directly:
rect.length * rect.width
Lloyd, thanks. But what if the
Lloyd Kvam pyt...@venix.com writes:
If the value will be computed on demand, __getattr__ is one way to go.
def __getattr__(self, attr):
if attr == 'foo':
return self.compute_foo()
elif
else:
raise
On 07/09/2009 04:22 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote:
That said, -N radios are more expensive than they should be, I think. I
don't personally have a use for medium-speed wireless that's worth the
extra money. -G is fast enough for Internet access and gigabit is for
large file transfer. Also lots
On 07/09/2009 04:22 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote:
That said, -N radios are more expensive than they should be, I think. I
don't personally have a use for medium-speed wireless that's worth the
extra money. -G is fast enough for Internet access and gigabit is for
large file transfer. Also lots
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 15:32 -0400, Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
The simplistic self.foo = self.compute_foo() will trigger a call to
__getattr__, so you can't use that within __getattr__.
That's not true; it *will*, however, trigger a call to __settattr__,
if it exists; that's what you're
http://www.schnews.co.uk/images/560-linux-large.jpg
--
Greg Rundlett
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
