Greetings Bruce,
Still thinking about your problem...
On Sunday 11 October 2009 17:01, Bruce Labitt wrote:
I did do an experiment that had curious results. Instead of sending
double precision binary data, I sent single precision or 'float'. I
was expecting to halve my transmission time,
Bruce Labitt bruce.lab...@myfairpoint.net
mailto:bruce.lab...@myfairpoint.net wrote:
What I'm trying to do: Optimizer for a radar power spectral density
problem
Problem: FFTs required in optimization loop take too long on current
workstation for the optimizer to even be viable.
Ted Roche writes:
I think I saw this written up in one of ACM's magazines, but those don't
get a lot of traffic. NPR did a story on a group at Stanford doing
computational photography - camera hardware with a Linux backend.
Another interesting thing is CHDK:
On 10/13/2009 08:41 AM, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
Another interesting thing is CHDK:
http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/CHDK
Regards,
--kevin
For folks just tuning in, the Canon Hack Development Kit is an add-on to
the firmware for the Canon Powershot series of cameras that offers lots
of
I don't know what model you have, but there were a few models that apparently
had some kind of chip in them, that gave out when it got a little humid or
something. Cannon paid the postage for my camera to be shipped and mailed back
to me so it was fixed. I looked it up on the internet one
Ted Roche writes:
For folks just tuning in, the Canon Hack Development Kit is an add-on to
the firmware for the Canon Powershot series of cameras that offers lots
of extensions to the functionality. Sadly, my Powershot passed away a
while ago, or I'd have fun testing this stuff.
I have
So, I've convinced my company to at least entertain the idea of using
embedded Linux on one of our upcoming projects, but I'm in need of some
research. I'm doing my own, of course, but I thought some of you might have
suggestions.
We would spin our own PCB with CPU etc., and I'm trying to figure
--- On Tue, 10/13/09, Drew Van Zandt drew.vanza...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Drew Van Zandt drew.vanza...@gmail.com
Subject: Suggestions - embedded Linux
To: GNHLUG gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
Date: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 10:36 AM
So, I've convinced my company to at
least entertain
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Drew Van Zandt drew.vanza...@gmail.comwrote:
So, I've convinced my company to at least entertain the idea of using
embedded Linux on one of our upcoming projects, but I'm in need of some
research. I'm doing my own, of course, but I thought some of you might
gnhlug-discuss-boun...@mail.gnhlug.org wrote on 10/13/2009 08:13:12 AM:
Greetings Bruce,
Still thinking about your problem...
Well, thank you for that!
On Sunday 11 October 2009 17:01, Bruce Labitt wrote:
I did do an experiment that had curious results. Instead of sending
double
--- On Tue, 10/13/09, Drew Van Zandt drew.vanza...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Drew Van Zandt drew.vanza...@gmail.com
Subject: Suggestions - embedded Linux
To: GNHLUG gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
Date: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 10:36 AM
So, I've convinced my company to at
least entertain
gnhlug-discuss-boun...@mail.gnhlug.org wrote on 10/13/2009 08:44:49 AM:
Bruce Labitt bruce.lab...@myfairpoint.net
mailto:bruce.lab...@myfairpoint.net wrote:
What I'm trying to do: Optimizer for a radar power spectral density
problem
Problem: FFTs required in optimization loop
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Kevin D. Clark
kevin_d_cl...@comcast.netwrote:
Ted Roche writes:
For folks just tuning in, the Canon Hack Development Kit is an add-on to
the firmware for the Canon Powershot series of cameras that offers lots
of extensions to the functionality. Sadly,
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Drew Van Zandt drew.vanza...@gmail.comwrote:
So, I've convinced my company to at least entertain the idea of using
embedded Linux on one of our upcoming projects, but I'm in need of some
research. I'm doing my own, of course, but I thought some of you might
On 10/13/2009 09:51 AM, Lori Nagel wrote:
I don't know what model you have, but there were a few models that apparently
had some kind of chip in them, that gave out when it got a little humid or
something. Cannon paid the postage for my camera to be shipped and mailed
back to me so it was
Jim Kuzdrall gnh...@intrel.com wrote on 10/13/2009 02:04:36 PM:
On Tuesday 13 October 2009 10:54, bruce.lab...@autoliv.com wrote:
gnhlug-discuss-boun...@mail.gnhlug.org wrote on 10/13/2009 08:13:12
AM:
Greetings Bruce,
Still thinking about your problem...
Well, thank you for
Let's try another sendmail question:
I'm running sendmail 8.14.3 on fedora 10 and I need help understanding how to
work with listening ports. I have two machines which I will call A and B.
A has two NICs: eth0 is connected to the outside, and B is connected to
eth1 on A. A is the sendmail server
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Steven W. Orr ste...@syslang.net wrote:
The list manager running on A was configured to send to localhost:24 ...
Why? :)
I did this by setting:
define(`confMAX_RCPTS_PER_MESSAGE', `20')dnl
which for me makes sense. (Am I wrong?) :-(
Well, that means
I was wondering where I could find some good tutorials on gnu-autotools and
using them in free software projects -thanks.
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
Lori Nagel wrote:
I was wondering where I could find some good tutorials on gnu-autotools and
using them in free software projects -thanks.
I would also like to see a condensed tutorial that would demystify this
art for me... till then I've made use of these:
the IDE Anjuta
On 10/13/09 17:34, quoth Ben Scott:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Steven W. Orr ste...@syslang.net wrote:
The list manager running on A was configured to send to localhost:24 ...
Why? :)
I did this by setting:
define(`confMAX_RCPTS_PER_MESSAGE', `20')dnl
which for me makes sense.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Steven W. Orr ste...@syslang.net wrote:
The way I understand it, sendmail made to switchover a while back to separate
out the sendmail process from the MSP. I guess the question is: Why did they
do this in the first place?
Security. To avoid having to run
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Ben Scott dragonh...@gmail.com wrote:
TCP/24 is assigned to LMTP, Local Mail Transfer Protocol.
P.S.: I'm pretty sure that whatever you've got configured on TCP/24,
it ain't LMTP. It appears to basically be a fairly typical Sendmail
SMTP MTA, except modified
23 matches
Mail list logo
