Never mind. I found an HP printer that let's you email print jobs to it.
No drivers needed, completely OS independent. Probably limited in the
format types, but I'll let you all know if there is anything particularly
lame about it.
___
Alan Johnson
a...@datdec.com
On Wed, Dec 15,
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Alan Johnson a...@datdec.com wrote:
I vaguely remember topics like this floating around before, but since these
things change so much I didn't see much point in digging it up.
I'm looking for a new scanner/printer/copier combo and my wife wants to be
able to
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Tyson Sawyer ty...@j3.org wrote:
The best part is that the cartridges include the ink heads.
I've been happy with my Epson printers until their heads clog and it
becomes useless junk.
Conversely, this makes the ink cartridges much more expensive.
I like
On 12/16/2010 10:59 AM, Tyson Sawyer wrote:
The best part is that the cartridges include the ink heads.
I've been happy with my Epson printers until their heads clog and it
becomes useless junk.
I've used many different printers over the years, as most of you have.
For the most part I have
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Benjamin Scott dragonh...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Tyson Sawyer ty...@j3.org wrote:
The best part is that the cartridges include the ink heads.
I've been happy with my Epson printers until their heads clog and it
becomes useless
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Jerry Feldman g...@blu.org wrote:
Generally, I can expect an HP ink-jet printer to last longer.
I used to swear by HP printers, and recommended nothing else for
longer than a decade. Their quality took a nose-dive circa 2006. Bad
designs, cheap construction,
I also have a Samsung CP600 that has been very reliable.
On Dec 16, 2010 3:50 PM, Benjamin Scott dragonh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Jerry Feldman g...@blu.org wrote:
Generally, I can expect an HP...
I used to swear by HP printers, and recommended nothing else for
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Tom Buskey t...@buskey.name wrote:
But ultimately, I hate ink jets for anything other than photo
printing. It doesn't help that most ink jet printers on the market
are incredibly cheap crap.
If you don't need/want/lustafter color, get a laser printer.
On Dec 16, 2010, at 4:02 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
(Anyone know why laser printers seem to only run at 600 DPI? Every
one I've checked (and I've l looked at dozens of models) specifies 600
DPI as the native resolution. I'm guessing it's something inherent in
the technology, but don't
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Ryan Stanyan ryan.stan...@gmail.com wrote:
I see the 600 DPI in terms of single dimensional resolution. So I'm
guessing that 600 DPI is the current limit for letter-sized paper in terms
of horizontal resolution.
Right. My question was, why are all laser
Ok granted I do work for HP, but...
The latest printer they gave to teleworkers is an OfficeJet 6500 which
is a home/SMB printer/scan/fax that sits on the desk. It is wired or
wireless network. CUPS and Win/Vista has no problem printing directly
to it, duplex and other 'printing profiles'
When my old HP laser died I went lookin for a Linux friendly
unit and settled on the Brother MFC 7840w laser. Works fine with Linux,
M$oft and Apple
with no issues. Wifi and ethernet ready(i use it hardwired to router)..
JFeole
--
On 12/16/10 4:02 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16,
(Anyone know why laser printers seem to only run at 600 DPI?
Every one I've checked (and I've l looked at dozens of models)
specifies 600 DPI as the native resolution. I'm guessing it's
something inherent in the technology, but don't actually have
any data.
There's nothing inherent in the
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Michael ODonnell
michael.odonn...@comcast.net wrote:
Therefore, if it seems that you're enjoying arbitrary restrictions that
always limit you to 600 DPI I'm guessing that they're, um, arbitrary.
Well, that's certainly possible, but I would have expected
On 12/16/2010 07:36 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Michael ODonnell
michael.odonn...@comcast.net wrote:
Therefore, if it seems that you're enjoying arbitrary restrictions that
always limit you to 600 DPI I'm guessing that they're, um, arbitrary.
Well, that's
Lower-priced, consumer-grade laser panels use a panel of LEDs to
generate the laser beams, one for each pixel across the page,
Ah! I was only thinking of conventional spinning-mirror technology but,
yes - now that he mentions it I, too, recall hearing of print engines
having one single
On 12/16/2010 7:20 PM, Michael ODonnell wrote:
(Anyone know why laser printers seem to only run at 600 DPI? Every
one I've checked (and I've l looked at dozens of models) specifies
600 DPI as the native resolution. I'm guessing it's something
inherent in the technology, but don't actually
17 matches
Mail list logo
