On 03/27/2016 10:08 AM, Greg Rundlett (freephile) wrote:
> "Previously, software releases using free and open source licenses
> were approved by an internal committee. But since we’ve always
> allowed our developers to open-source their work, we’re eliminating
> the unnecessary hurdle: from now on
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Greg Rundlett (freephile) <
g...@freephile.com> wrote:
> Code written by Govt. employees is 'Public Domain', meaning specifically
> exempted from copyright.
>
> However, most? government software is written by contractors, and not
> published or shared. I don't
"Previously, software releases using free and open source licenses were
approved by an internal committee. But since we’ve always allowed our
developers to open-source their work, we’re eliminating the unnecessary
hurdle: from now on any open source request will be viewed as the default
and
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:18 PM, David Rysdam wrote:
> "Greg Rundlett (freephile)" writes:
> > If the government actually goes through with 'open sourcing' their work,
> > it's actually a giant corporate handout because companies will have
> greater
> >