Ben Scott wrote:
> On 5/25/07, mike ledoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Obviously, the take it offlist conversation needs to be taken offlist.
>>> :-P
>> Can we take the requests to take these conversations offlist offlist please?
>
> Can we take ...
>
> Stack overflow
http://www.dilbert
On 5/25/07, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/25/07, mike ledoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Obviously, the take it offlist conversation needs to be taken offlist.
> >> :-P
> > Can we take the requests to take these conversations offlist offlist please?
> Can we take ...
> Stack
On 5/25/07, mike ledoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Obviously, the take it offlist conversation needs to be taken offlist. :-P
>
> Can we take the requests to take these conversations offlist offlist please?
Can we take ...
Stack overflow
___
gnh
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 11:37:44AM -0400, Thomas Charron wrote:
> On 5/25/07, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > DISCLAIMER: Opinions expressed in the below are the personal opinions of the
> > author, and do not necessarily represent the views or policy of GNHLUG.
> > On 5/25/07, Ted Roche <
Thomas Charron wrote:
> Obviously, the take it offlist conversation needs to be taken offlist. :-P
rof,l! I'll be glad to honor your request!
--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-di
On 5/25/07, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DISCLAIMER: Opinions expressed in the below are the personal opinions of the
> author, and do not necessarily represent the views or policy of GNHLUG.
> On 5/25/07, Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ... I don't think there's anything wrong w
