Re: [OT] Terminal width (was: OpenOffice question)

2010-04-05 Thread Ted Roche
On 04/05/2010 05:26 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote: > (Or maybe it does; hypothetical situations are > tough to analyze. :) ) > In theory, hypothetical situations are easy to analyze. In reality,... > In that vein: WRT short text messages (SMS, microblogging, etc.), is > there any reason to suppos

Re: [OT] Terminal width (was: OpenOffice question)

2010-04-05 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Ted Roche wrote: >> I was thinking the other day about that. I was wondering if/when >> the community-at-large reach a point where something wider than 80 >> columns becomes the standard.  And if so, what will it be, or what >> will define it? > > It's difficult for

Re: [OT] Terminal width (was: OpenOffice question)

2010-04-05 Thread Ted Roche
On 03/29/2010 09:34 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote: > I was thinking the other day about that. I was wondering if/when > the community-at-large reach a point where something wider than 80 > columns becomes the standard. And if so, what will it be, or what > will define it? It's difficult for the huma

Re: [OT] Terminal width (was: OpenOffice question)

2010-04-05 Thread Bill McGonigle
On 03/31/2010 07:22 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote: > Something which I've long thought should be done but which no > mainstream OS GUI I've seen does well is increasing screen resolution > to increase quality of rendering while keeping the human information > density per inch around the same OSX has be

Re: [OT] Terminal width (was: OpenOffice question)

2010-03-31 Thread Tom Buskey
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Bill McGonigle > wrote: > > On 03/29/2010 09:34 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote: > >> "Yes, this means you'll be a better programmer if you get a bigger > monitor." > > > > FWIW, I got a 24" LCD display for this re

Re: [OT] Terminal width (was: OpenOffice question)

2010-03-31 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote: > On 03/29/2010 09:34 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote: >> "Yes, this means you'll be a better programmer if you get a bigger monitor." > > FWIW, I got a 24" LCD display for this reason, but it turns out to be > slightly too large.  I have to turn my

Re: [OT] Terminal width (was: OpenOffice question)

2010-03-31 Thread Bill McGonigle
On 03/29/2010 09:34 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote: > It's commonly claimed that human > understanding significantly increases when the information is fit in > to the field-of-view at one time. That has been my experience, both > personally, and with others. As one CS instructor put it > (paraphrase),

Re: [OT] Terminal width (was: OpenOffice question)

2010-03-30 Thread Jerry Feldman
On 03/29/2010 09:34 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Ric Werme wrote: > >> ... I find myself sticking to emacs and its "fill paragraph" >> function and 80 column lines. It's amazing how much influence IBM cards >> still have on me and other right-thinking individual

[OT] Terminal width (was: OpenOffice question)

2010-03-29 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Ric Werme wrote: > ... I find myself sticking to emacs and its "fill paragraph" > function and 80 column lines.  It's amazing how much influence IBM cards > still have on me and other right-thinking individuals. I was thinking the other day about that. I was wo