Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The real down side of forwarding is that DNS search order breaks
(this might be fixed in BIND 9, but was definitely broken with BIND
4.x -- I haven't tried it since then).
This has always worked for me just fine with BIND 8.x. I'm even
kinda
On 4/19/05, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIRC, the problem was actually the listing of multiple search lines in
/etc/resolv.conf. The first search line was referenced, possibly the
second, but I believe the tertiary was ignored. FWIW, MS had a
similar problem too. Windows would
Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 4/19/05, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIRC, the problem was actually the listing of multiple search lines in
/etc/resolv.conf. The first search line was referenced, possibly the
second, but I believe the tertiary was ignored. FWIW, MS had a
On 4/19/05, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
everybody else, Microsoft based their initial IP stack on BSD. I
dunno how much of the BSD code survives in current stuff.
Was it BSD? I couldn't remember. They seem to have hosed it up
pretty well
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 05:51:11PM -0400, Tom Buskey wrote:
I wonder if there are any TCP stacks that are not derived from BSD.
(SCO maybe??? ;-)
The Mentat TCP/IP stack (which is STREAMS-focused) is used in a number
of different environments, including HP-UX 11i, and a version is in Sun.
It's a
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Derek Martin wrote:
You have two options here, too: let your name server do all its own look-ups
of host that aren't yours, or have it forward requests to your ISP's
servers. Both options have advantages.
Recent versions of BIND (8.0 and newer, I think) have an option in
