Re: Files, unliking, access, oh my.

2013-02-19 Thread Joshua Judson Rosen
Ben Scott writes: > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote: > > If process A is reading from a file, and process B deletes it, process > > A can continue to read from it until... well, until it stops reading > > from it. [...] > > Can that space that the file takes up be overwrit

Re: Files, unliking, access, oh my.

2013-02-19 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote: > If process A is reading from a file, and process B deletes it, process > A can continue to read from it until... well, until it stops reading > from it. It can also seek it, write to it, etc. This condition persists until the process cal

Re: Files, unliking, access, oh my.

2013-02-19 Thread Michael ODonnell
>Can that space that the file takes up be overwritten during >this interim? Or does the OS hold the inode sacrosanct until >both references AND processes are no longer making use of it? Right - the OS's official record of a file's state is the (in-memory copy of the) inode - the directory entri

Files, unliking, access, oh my.

2013-02-19 Thread Ken D'Ambrosio
Hey, all. For various esoteric reasons, I'm wondering if someone can tell me the answer to this question. If process A is reading from a file, and process B deletes it, process A can continue to read from it until... well, until it stops reading from it. Can that space that the file takes up