On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Thomas Charron wrote:
> Didn't know that suddenly we needed disclaimers to make that point.
I'm on the Board of Directors (such as it is) of the entity
registered with the state of NH as "Greater New Hampshire Linux Users
Group". I brought up GNHLUG as an examp
ail/python-dev/2009-January/085347.html
Hopefully these docs and discussions will give you some insight on what you
want to do for your code.
-Shawn
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Bruce Dawson
> To: Greg Rundlett
> Cc: GNHLUG
> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 11:22
Hi Ben,
On 03/01/2009 03:25 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Thomas Charron wrote:
And then, the granting of an entirely new license. Note the right the
'rent and resell':
Renting and reselling Free Software is not prohibited by any of the
major licenses, as fa
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
> DISCLAIMER: I always speak only for myself, unless otherwise explicitly
> stated.
As always, everyone here does. :-D
Didn't know that suddenly we needed disclaimers to make that point.
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Thomas Charron wro
DISCLAIMER: I always speak only for myself, unless otherwise explicitly stated.
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Thomas Charron wrote:
> Here's the crux of the complaints against sourceforges TOS ...
Yes, I read them. Which is more than most do, I think. Witness my
objection to "proprietary";
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Greg Rundlett
> wrote:
>> Sourceforge's TOS basically "All your code are belong to
>> us" (you grant them a proprietary license [1]).
> That's a bit much. Now, their TOS are confusing, no doubt about it.
> But
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Greg Rundlett
wrote:
> Sourceforge's TOS basically "All your code are belong to
> us" (you grant them a proprietary license [1]).
That's a bit much. Now, their TOS are confusing, no doubt about it.
But in addition what you're looking at, they also state "Excep
e there anymore.)
- Original Message
From: Bruce Dawson
To: Greg Rundlett
Cc: GNHLUG
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 11:22:21 AM
Subject: Re: Launchpad to be free
Greg Rundlett wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote:
>
>
>> On 02/27/200
Greg Rundlett wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote:
>
>
>> On 02/27/2009 08:35 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>>
>>> Somewhere or another there was an explanation in writing... Oh, there,
>>> found it:
>>>
>> Ah:
>>
>> "There are two components, Soyuz and Codehosti
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> On 02/27/2009 08:35 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > Somewhere or another there was an explanation in writing... Oh, there,
> > found it:
>
> Ah:
>
> "There are two components, Soyuz and Codehosting, that we're keeping
> internal. They're part of
On 02/27/2009 08:35 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Somewhere or another there was an explanation in writing... Oh, there,
> found it:
Ah:
"There are two components, Soyuz and Codehosting, that we're keeping
internal. They're part of Canonical's "secret sauce" in business areas
that we care a lot abo
On Feb 27, 2009, at 6:42 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> On 02/27/2009 11:40 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>>
>> Minor correction: Canonical has committed to releasing*most* of
>> launchpad. There are two components, one of which is a fairly
>> major piece (makes ppas possible), which are not being release
On 02/27/2009 11:40 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>
> Minor correction: Canonical has committed to releasing*most* of
> launchpad. There are two components, one of which is a fairly
> major piece (makes ppas possible), which are not being released.
How odd. Launchpad isn't the crown jewel of the empir
On Thursday 26 February 2009 22:50:52 Greg Rundlett (freephile) wrote:
> OK, so I guess I must have been sleeping, or people aren't as
> interested in this as I am, but I just found out that Canonical has
> committed to releasing Launchpad by 21 July 2009 under the GNU Affero
> license v3
Minor co
OK, so I guess I must have been sleeping, or people aren't as
interested in this as I am, but I just found out that Canonical has
committed to releasing Launchpad by 21 July 2009 under the GNU Affero
license v3
https://dev.launchpad.net/OpenSourcing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_open_
15 matches
Mail list logo
