On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 09:12, Tilly, Lawrence wrote:
It could also be data access time. Not sure what software they're
using, but while you're doing your search you're probably tying up web
threads, worker threads in a JVM (assuming java-based application
server), database connections and
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 07:28:05AM -0500, Fred wrote:
If there resources are so limited that they have to worry about 20K or
30K downloads, they really should seriously consider upgrading their
computers
LiveJournal.com hosts four racks of hardware, including 7 different
database clusters
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 07:37, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 07:28:05AM -0500, Fred wrote:
If there resources are so limited that they have to worry about 20K or
30K downloads, they really should seriously consider upgrading their
computers
LiveJournal.com hosts
On Nov 24, 2004, at 07:28, Fred wrote:
If there resources are so limited that they have to worry about 20K or
30K downloads, they really should seriously consider upgrading their
computers
Ah, mergeritis.
See, your local bank with 10,000 customers might be OK with keeping a
meg of data online
Systems are a major part of the equation on 'Wall St.'. The systems are
immense, and viewed as a tool to control costs, and increase profits.
There are many influencers in the equation: employees, regulators,
customers, partners, competitors etc. If there was a positive
cost/benefit
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 10:57, Bill McGonigle wrote:
...
See, your local bank with 10,000 customers might be OK with keeping a
meg of data online for you and sifting through it for what you want to
see. That's ten gigs of reliable online storage - not too bad.
Then your bank gets bought by
it and getting poor performance.
-L
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Rundlett
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 10:08 PM
To: Fred
Cc: Bill Mullen; GNHLUG
Subject: Re: OT -- 90-day limits in the financial world for downloading
your data.
Fred
I'm guessing this is the real reason...
Original message
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:17:09 -0500
From: Bill Mullen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Years ago, before online banking existed, [...]
We had the same policy then for the account
history data that we made available to the tellers
over the
Fred wrote:
On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 12:17, Bill Mullen wrote:
I suspect that the real issue here is merely one of storage space; by
setting a fixed period for which they will make data available (last 90
days, last 3 statement periods, whatever), they can move enough
transactions out of the
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 23:56, Fred wrote:
So, maybe some of you have had some banking experience. Is there some
sort of obscure Federal regulation or similar that stipulates that
financial institutions can only allow a max of 90 days of data at a time
to the customer? And why would their be
On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 12:17, Bill Mullen wrote:
I suspect that the real issue here is merely one of storage space; by
setting a fixed period for which they will make data available (last 90
days, last 3 statement periods, whatever), they can move enough
transactions out of the database to
11 matches
Mail list logo
