On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 09:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To avoid rehashing, here are the two arguments:
>
> Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>
> Reply-To Munging Considered Useful
> http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml
Tha
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, at 2:50am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> BTW, Is there a reason why mailman isn't configured to set the reply-to
> header?
Some time back, the list took a vote, and more people voted "harmful" then
"useful", and we went with the plurality.
To avoid rehashing, here are the tw
