On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 05:31:07PM -0500, Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Speaking of SATA, how well is SATA supported in 2.6? Is it at the point
> I can buy a SATA motherboard "blind" and not worry? Or do we still have
> a way to go yet?
Just thought I'd add a couple of pointers to more informa
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 12:50:32AM -0500, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> The other path makes SATA support into Just Another Device Driver. In
> practice, this means think of SATA as SCSI. You need the right driver or
> you go nowhere. This is also the same on both doze and nix. For nix, it
> means
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, at 5:31pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Speaking of SATA, how well is SATA supported in 2.6? Is it at the point I
> can buy a SATA motherboard "blind" and not worry? Or do we still have a
> way to go yet?
As I understand it, when it comes to SATA, there are two paths.
One p
On Feb 21, 2005, at 17:31, Fred wrote:
Speaking of SATA, how well is SATA supported in 2.6? Is it at the point
I can buy a SATA motherboard "blind" and not worry?
No. I did that and I'm spending lots of time digging through Google
tonight. The disk (Segate) works fine in PATA emulation mode but,
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 13:33 -0500, Bob Bell wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 10:59:42AM -0500, Derek Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > No, I'm not. If my server has a new mass storage controller that
> > isn't recognized by the 2.4 kernel, but is recognized by the 2.6
> > controller, then d
