Re: What's the best way to automatically swap smart hosts(sendmail)?

2003-07-02 Thread Jerry Feldman
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 23:47:13 -0400 Derek Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ATT did /not/ filter outgoing port 25. I ran my mail server off my ATT connection for years until very recently, and know a number of other people who did/do too. Maybe you're confusing them with Earthlink, who (at

Re: What's the best way to automatically swap smart hosts (sendmail)?

2003-07-02 Thread Tom Buskey
Derek Martin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 12:05:32PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Comcast blocks outbound connects to TCP port 25. You have to use their relays. [snip] Okay. Well, ATT Broadband did. I don't really know about Comcast, but I

Re: What's the best way to automatically swap smart hosts (sendmail)?

2003-07-02 Thread bscott
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, at 11:22am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ATT did /not/ filter outgoing port 25. I run my own mail server, incoming outgoing, on attbi/comcast They don't seem to be doing anything to block it either way (yet). Okay, I've checked my notes, and yes, I had my wires crossed. We

Re: What's the best way to automatically swap smart hosts (sendmail)?

2003-07-02 Thread Roger H. Goun
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 09:31:28AM -0400, Bill Freeman wrote: I could fiddle with the RH scripts that are run when the LAN connection comes up or goes down to link /etc/mail/sendmail.cf to one of two alternatives. (Or, alternatively, and probably better, swap when PPP comes up or goes

What's the best way to automatically swap smart hosts (sendmail)?

2003-07-01 Thread Bill Freeman
Sometimes my laptop is home, connected to the cable modem. At these times I need my sendmail smart host set to smtp.comcast.net since my dial up ISP's outgoing mail server (rightly so) is not an open relay. (I suppose that a VPN tunnel is a possibility here.) Sometimes I'm away

Re: What's the best way to automatically swap smart hosts (sendmail)?

2003-07-01 Thread bscott
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, at 9:31am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone think of any cool ways to do this? Use an SMTP relay that supports SMTP authentication, and will allow relay from outside the local network if SMTP AUTH is done. Configure Sendmail to use that relay at all times, and to

RE: What's the best way to automatically swap smart hosts (sendmail)?

2003-07-01 Thread Travis Roy
://poprelay.sourceforge.net/ But smtp auth is probably the way to go. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 9:46 AM To: Greater NH Linux User Group Subject: Re: What's the best way to automatically swap smart hosts

Re: What's the best way to automatically swap smart hosts (sendmail)?

2003-07-01 Thread Dan Coutu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, at 9:31am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone think of any cool ways to do this? Use an SMTP relay that supports SMTP authentication, and will allow relay from outside the local network if SMTP AUTH is done. Configure Sendmail to use that

RE: What's the best way to automatically swap smart hosts (sendmail)?

2003-07-01 Thread Travis Roy
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Travis Roy Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 9:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: What's the best way to automatically swap smart hosts (sendmail)? Another way is pop-auth. You check your mail and then your IP address is put into a file

Re: What's the best way to automatically swap smart hosts (sendmail)?

2003-07-01 Thread pll
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Travis == Travis Roy wrote: Travis Since you're going to do some work for this... Maybe once you've figured it all out, you could write a HOWTO type doc for the GNHLUG Wiki :) -- Seeya, Paul -- Key fingerprint = 1660 FECC 5D21 D286 F853 E808 BB07 9239 53F1 28EE

Re: What's the best way to automatically swap smart hosts (sendmail)?

2003-07-01 Thread Marc Nozell
My laptop also travels between different networks (home, work-behind-firewall and work-not-behind-firewall). I set the smtp host for evolution (kmail, mozilla -mail, etc) to be: localhost:2525 and then use a network-appropriate script to forward the mail across ssh to a properly configured mail

Re: What's the best way to automatically swap smart hosts (sendmail)?

2003-07-01 Thread pll
In a message dated: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 11:13:05 EDT Marc Nozell said: I set the smtp host for evolution (kmail, mozilla -mail, etc) to be: localhost:2525 and then use a network-appropriate script to forward the mail across ssh to a properly configured mail server.=20 #!/bin/bash #

Re: What's the best way to automatically swap smart hosts (sendmail)?

2003-07-01 Thread bscott
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, at 9:54am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since MV now supports SMTP authentication I think that you have your solution. Use it all the time. That will not work for the OP, since he mentions he uses Comcast, and Comcast blocks outbound connects to TCP port 25. You have to use

RE: What's the best way to automatically swap smart hosts (sendmail)?

2003-07-01 Thread Travis Roy
That will not work for the OP, since he mentions he uses Comcast, and Comcast blocks outbound connects to TCP port 25. You have to use their relays. They don't yet.. I know many people that run smtp servers on comcast that don't have to relay thru the comcast smtp server.

Re: What's the best way to automatically swap smart hosts (sendmail)?

2003-07-01 Thread bscott
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, at 11:56am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can I relay through comcast with my wayga.org domain intact, or do they not allow that? ATT Broadband always allowed relay with a From address or SMTP reverse-path that did not end in attbi.com. I'd assume Comcast also allowed it,

Re: What's the best way to automatically swap smart hosts (sendmail)?

2003-07-01 Thread Bill Freeman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Travis == Travis Roy wrote: Travis Since you're going to do some work for this... Maybe once you've figured it all out, you could write a HOWTO type doc for the GNHLUG Wiki :) I assume that you meant this for me. I'll think