Re: ifconfig nightmare

2003-03-07 Thread pll
In a message dated: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 20:53:45 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >did you do what Paul >Lussier does, and configure a default route via every router on your >network, plus a few that don't exist? ;-) Hey! I resemble that remark! And further more, resent the heckling! *YOU* are the o

Re: ifconfig nightmare

2003-03-07 Thread pll
In a message dated: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 08:55:30 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> I defined a default gateway for each (oooh that might be it?) > > That would be it, yes. If you define multiple default gateways, you will >have multiple default gateways. ;-) Wow! This scenario seems rather vaguely

Re: ifconfig nightmare

2003-03-07 Thread bscott
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, at 6:18am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> By "virtual", do you mean "aliased"? That is, a single Ethernet >> interface with multiple IP addresses? Or do you mean 802.1Q VLAN >> interfaces? > > I have an eth0, eth0:1, eth0:2 ... eth0:8 Okay, those are "aliased" interfaces. "V

Re: ifconfig nightmare

2003-03-07 Thread T. Warfield
At 08:53 PM 3/6/03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, at 6:43pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have a machine with some 8 virtual interfaces. By "virtual", do you mean "aliased"? That is, a single Ethernet interface with multiple IP addresses? Or do you mean 802.1Q VLAN interfac

Re: ifconfig nightmare

2003-03-06 Thread bscott
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, at 6:43pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have a machine with some 8 virtual interfaces. By "virtual", do you mean "aliased"? That is, a single Ethernet interface with multiple IP addresses? Or do you mean 802.1Q VLAN interfaces? > I rebooted tonight and now my routing tabl

ifconfig nightmare

2003-03-06 Thread T. Warfield
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have a machine with some 8 virtual interfaces. I rebooted tonight and now my routing table has some 13 default routes, and is routing all traffic through one of the virtuals instead of the real eth0 ip. Any thoughts? T. Warfield [EMAIL PROTE