I just want to add the response to my bugzilla submission. Note that
there is an LVM2 as well as kernel issue. Both are fixed, but neither is
in the latest Fedora 12 updates. When I have some time I will install
LVM2 2.02.62 either by building from source or binary install from the
repo. I may
On 03/06/2010 06:55 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
>
>> First I booted into Knoppix 6.2.1, started raid1, pvcreate failed,
>> stopped mdadm and did a pvcreate on /dev/sdc2.
>> Booted back into Fedora, and I have successfully done a vgextend to
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> First I booted into Knoppix 6.2.1, started raid1, pvcreate failed,
> stopped mdadm and did a pvcreate on /dev/sdc2.
> Booted back into Fedora, and I have successfully done a vgextend to
> /dev/md1 ...
Ummm... I'm not sure, but I think that
I've finally done a successful pvcreate.
First I booted into Knoppix 6.2.1, started raid1, pvcreate failed,
stopped mdadm and did a pvcreate on /dev/sdc2.
Booted back into Fedora, and I have successfully done a vgextend to
/dev/md1, and am now moving the extents over. Once I have everything
moved,
On 03/04/2010 06:09 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> Wow. That's an expensive cat. :-(
>
>
True
--
Jerry Feldman
Boston Linux and Unix
PGP key id: 537C5846
PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> I'm wondering if I can boot from a live cd and do that step
> from something like gparted or Knoppix.
Oh, that's a good point! pvcreate doesn't do anything in the LVM
database or Volume Group; it essentially just does some sanity checks
and
On 03/04/2010 11:23 AM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
>
>> On 03/03/2010 09:53 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
>>
>>> md1 (currently only on sdc2) is bigger than sda2. You will not be
>>> able to mirror md1 back on to sda2 without repartitioning
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> On 03/03/2010 09:53 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
>> md1 (currently only on sdc2) is bigger than sda2. You will not be
>> able to mirror md1 back on to sda2 without repartitioning sda, which
>> will mean removing sda1 from md0.
>>
> That is int
On 03/04/2010 09:50 AM, Tom Buskey wrote:
>
>
> FWIW, BSD (& Solaris) also uses cylinder boundries. 8 slices per disk
> (0-7). Slice 2 is the full disk cylinders 0-N and shouldn't be used
> for anything. Overlapping cylinders will lead to data loss eventually
> and newer versions of Solaris prev
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> > I am running Fedora 12 with kernel 2.6.31.12-174.2.3.fc12.x86_64
> > LVM is lvm2-2.02.53-2.fc12.x86_64
>
> Does Fedora have an updates for the kernel or LVM (or device mapper,
> etc
On 03/03/2010 09:53 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> Neat. Whoever wrote that code split the error message across
> multiple adjacent C literal strings. Sometimes I wonder if
> programmers are deliberately making our lives harder.
>
You should have seen how we did it in lint on Tru64. Part of it u
On 03/03/2010 09:53 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> Your two disks (eventually to be mirrored) are identical in size,
> but the partition tables are different. That is okay, but it may
> confuse people and/or software. For example:
>
> md1 (currently only on sdc2) is bigger than sda2. You will no
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> I am running Fedora 12 with kernel 2.6.31.12-174.2.3.fc12.x86_64
> LVM is lvm2-2.02.53-2.fc12.x86_64
Does Fedora have an updates for the kernel or LVM (or device mapper,
etc.) to install?
> I've posted the details at: http://pastebin.com/4
On 03/03/2010 12:59 AM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
>
>> The difference between the way I did it an your suggestion is I had
>> missing before the /dev/sdc2.
>>
> I'm pretty sure that doesn't matter.
>
> Going back to the OP:
>
> On Mon,
Sure, I'll paste a full dump later on - not to the listserv.
I am running Fedora 12 with kernel 2.6.31.12-174.2.3.fc12.x86_64
Processor is an AMD Opteron Quad Core. 6GB memory.
LVM is lvm2-2.02.53-2.fc12.x86_64
The error message was copied and pasted:
[...@gaf ~]$ sudo pvcreate /dev/md1
/dev/md1:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> The difference between the way I did it an your suggestion is I had
> missing before the /dev/sdc2.
I'm pretty sure that doesn't matter.
Going back to the OP:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> [r...@gaf gaf]# pvcre
On 03/01/2010 07:41 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
>
>> pe_align (128 sectors) must not be less than pe_align_offset
>> (36028797018963967 sectors)
>>
> By my calculations, the second number of sectors works out to 16
> million terabytes,
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> pe_align (128 sectors) must not be less than pe_align_offset
> (36028797018963967 sectors)
By my calculations, the second number of sectors works out to 16
million terabytes, which makes me suspect the diagnostic itself is
broken, or being
I am migrating my system to a raid 1.
Given:
Disk /dev/sdc: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x0003a96c
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdc1
19 matches
Mail list logo
