Bruce Dawson wrote:
So either we have to increase the priority of going to a meeting, or
lower the priority of people staying away. The former can be done by
having higher quality speakers, famous people, more interesting
subjects, more career/job benefits, ... The latter can't really be
First, apologies: My original was perhaps a bit more acidic than intended.
Ted Roche wrote:
Bruce Dawson wrote:
So either we have to increase the priority of going to a meeting, or
lower the priority of people staying away. The former can be done by
having higher quality speakers, famous
Bruce Dawson wrote:
First, apologies: My original was perhaps a bit more acidic than intended.
And back 'atcha: email is a great medium to promote misunderstandings.
Provide a non-time and non-location dependent way of meeting.
Its also known as a geek teaser, _and_ allows for virtual
On 10/12/07, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't matter. No one else answers anyway. Looks like I'll have to
call the rest of the board to find out if they'll join us.
I see this as a big problem.
If we can't even find the time to let you know if we can find the
time to meet, how
