Re: New Internet server - Getting the ball rolling

2006-02-09 Thread Jeff Kinz
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 10:00:56AM -0500, Ben Scott wrote:
> On 2/9/06, Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, you need to pick a distro your sysadmins are comfortable with and
> > packages to manage GNHLUG functions.
> 
>   Due to the time pressure mentioned, at this point, we're going to
> have to shift focus from finding the ideal distribution to getting the
> existing web site (which consists mainly of TWiki) up and running
> ASAP.  I'm gonna send the announcement out today, and wait a few days
> to see who responds.  At this point, I'm expecting will go with either
> a RHEL clone or Fedora, simply because that's closest to what we're
> running now.  (Again, time pressure.)

RHEL, RHEL Clones , Or Fedora are all good because using one of these
distros takes advantage of, (ie exploits :-), the large community of
developers that has sprung up around this distro family.

Their efforts work to our benefit, and to the degree that some of us 
contribute back to that family we are paying our dues into the
community. 

Centos, an RHEL 4 clone, has the right license fee - $0, as does Fedora
Core 4/5 (5 is just about out.). For GNHLUG that seems like the right
level of cash expenditure  

The Fedora community is huge and has highly active web forums, IRC
channel, and email communities as well as some third part repositories
of extras.  The Centos community is not as large as the Fedora
community, but it also pretty active and has a good wiki.

I am using Centos for personal use servers I am building now as
opposed to Fedora for reasons of stability which I value utmost on a
server. Centos is built from the same source as RedHat's Enterprise
products and so, theoretically, has been further "vetted" by RedHat's
internal QA process.

I suggest that GNHLUG use Centos unless someone knows of severe issues
with it.


(For Non-geek desktops, I'm recommending Kubuntu!.. :-) )






 
> -- Ben
> ___
> gnhlug-org mailing list
> gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
> http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org
> 

-- 
Jeff Kinz, Emergent Research, Hudson, MA.
speech recognition software may have been used to create this e-mail

"The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men
of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding." - Brandeis

To think contrary to one's era is heroism. But to speak against it is
madness. -- Eugene Ionesco
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org


Re: New Internet server - Getting the ball rolling

2006-02-09 Thread Ed Lawson
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 10:00:56 -0500
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  I'm gonna send the announcement out today, and wait a few days
> to see who responds.  

Not sure what I could do besides watch and say things like "This
would be easier with Debian and apt-get", but would be glad to
help when the time comes.  What is involved here?  Is the
hardware in place?  Need to download apps to install?
Help set up applications?

Ed Lawson

-- 
Edward E. Lawson, Esq.
Lawson & Persson, PC
67 Water Street, Suite 103
Laconia, NH 03246
Tel:  603-528-0036
FAX:603-528-3332


NOTICE REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY AND ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE

This message, including any attachments, is a PRIVATE communication which may 
contain attorney/client privileged material and is for the exclusive use of the 
intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, 
copy, use, or disclose to others. If you have received this message in error, 
please reply to sender and delete this message from your system. Thank you.




___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org


Re: New Internet server - Getting the ball rolling

2006-02-09 Thread Ben Scott
On 2/9/06, Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, you need to pick a distro your sysadmins are comfortable with and
> packages to manage GNHLUG functions.

  Due to the time pressure mentioned, at this point, we're going to
have to shift focus from finding the ideal distribution to getting the
existing web site (which consists mainly of TWiki) up and running
ASAP.  I'm gonna send the announcement out today, and wait a few days
to see who responds.  At this point, I'm expecting will go with either
a RHEL clone or Fedora, simply because that's closest to what we're
running now.  (Again, time pressure.)

-- Ben
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org


Re: New Internet server - Getting the ball rolling

2006-02-09 Thread Ed Lawson
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 09:26:42 -0500
Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> What functions are those?
> 1, Email lists
> 2, Calendar
> 3. Basic web site CMS
> 
> Anything else?
> 

Some type of Forum/Wiki?

Moodle for supplying structured info on how use/install/configure
linux/applications?

Ed Lawson

-- 
Edward E. Lawson, Esq.
Lawson & Persson, PC
67 Water Street, Suite 103
Laconia, NH 03246
Tel:  603-528-0036
FAX:603-528-3332


NOTICE REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY AND ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE

This message, including any attachments, is a PRIVATE communication which may 
contain attorney/client privileged material and is for the exclusive use of the 
intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, 
copy, use, or disclose to others. If you have received this message in error, 
please reply to sender and delete this message from your system. Thank you.




___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org


Re: New Internet server - Getting the ball rolling

2006-02-09 Thread Ted Roche

Go, Ben, go!

So, you need to pick a distro your sysadmins are comfortable with and  
packages to manage GNHLUG functions.


What functions are those?
1, Email lists
2, Calendar
3. Basic web site CMS

Anything else?

Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

On Feb 7, 2006, at 8:46 PM, Ben Scott wrote:


Okay, so I've been hidously guilty of dragging my feet on the whole
"New Internet server" thing.  Actualy, it's more like I've encased my
feet in concrete.  I'm guilty.  I'm trying to remedy that.


___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org


Re: New Internet server - Getting the ball rolling

2006-02-08 Thread Bruce Dawson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ben Scott wrote:
> I'm cross-posting this to gnhlug-org and gnhlug-sysadmin, since 
> -sysadmin hasn't had a chance to get people subscribed to it yet.
> 
> On 2/8/06, Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>>I really would like to get the new server operational (with the old
>>>stuff) before I swap out hive.
> 
> 
>   Fair enough.  We'll plan on that.  Do you have a specific date for
> the hive swap over yet?

It looks like it will be some night during the week of March 6th. At
least I hope its just one night.

- --Bruce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD6l9d/TBScWXa5IgRArrIAJwKfVPCHbPYa9ZDAcQRxECExvJcaACfdm0V
bTFa0qlsrLr/ICF3s+pHaZ0=
=VzGk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org


Re: New Internet server - Getting the ball rolling

2006-02-08 Thread Ben Scott
I'm cross-posting this to gnhlug-org and gnhlug-sysadmin, since 
-sysadmin hasn't had a chance to get people subscribed to it yet.

On 2/8/06, Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I really would like to get the new server operational (with the old
>> stuff) before I swap out hive.

  Fair enough.  We'll plan on that.  Do you have a specific date for
the hive swap over yet?

  Consequences of accelerating deployment of the new server:

  We won't have any general discussion on choice of distro.  There
isn't time for a flame war, or even a cultured debate.  :-)

  Along the same lines, initially, the "group project" approach will
have to be somewhat minimized.  I had hoped we could tackle things in
the manner of, "What have to decide what to do about XYZ.  What do
people think?", and proceed towards consensus.  (Unrealistic, perhaps,
but likely to be interesting and educational.)  Instead, early
decisions will have to be made by the preferences of the person
tackling the task, and we'll have to hope any real bad decisions (if
any) get caught before we're too deep into them.

On 2/8/06, Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I like the group project idea - maybe that can be done for GNHLUG
> V3?  (V1 was the postnuke site, V2 was TWiki). Just get what we currently
> have running on the new server. Then change it.

  Well, certainly, going forward, I expect more and different things
will be done by more and more people.  We just won't be able to do
that as much initially.

> Well, you might want to check out my additions!

  Ahhh.  Indeed.  :)

-- Ben
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org


Re: New Internet server - Getting the ball rolling

2006-02-08 Thread Ben Scott
On 2/8/06, Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> List created.

  Thanks!

> Ben: Please call me at [deleted] so I can give you the list
> password.

  Mailman mailed me the the list info and admin password when the list
was created.

> One of the servers is being replaced - software and hardware - in early
> March. Its the server with the CentraLUG site on it. The server with the
> mailing list and TWiki will be replaced sometime afterwards - hopefully
> this summer.

  H.  I believe TWiki is hosted on the same server as CentraLUG:

www.centralug.org = 199.125.75.9
www.gnhlug.org = 199.125.75.9
wiki.gnhlug.org = 199.125.75.9
199.125.75.9 = hive.colo.mv.net

mail.gnhlug.org = 199.125.75.14
199.125.75.14 = rogue.codemeta.com

  Does this mean we have to have the new server operational for web
use before you replace hive in March?  That's probably doable, but it
will almost certainly mean the "group project" idea will have to be
killed.  That's the price I pay for procrastination, I guess.

> Thanks for setting up the info on the TWiki ...

  You're welcome.  I hope to keep adding more info and keep the ball
rolling.  If I falter, everyone is welcome to harass me (more then
usual, I mean).

-- Ben
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org


Re: New Internet server - Getting the ball rolling

2006-02-08 Thread Bruce Dawson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ben Scott wrote:
> I think we should have a separate mailing list for server/IT
> administration, to keep from flooding this channel.  Proposed name:
> .  I didn't get any objections last time I floated
> this idea (if you have any, speak now!).  Who here knows what is
> needed to make a new list on the GNHLUG list server?

List created.

Ben: Please call me at 800-468-8750 x102 so I can give you the list
password.

>>Time pressure <
> Bruce, you mentioned that certain upgrades on your servers will be
> happening soon.  What were those, and when would they be happening?

One of the servers is being replaced - software and hardware - in early
March. Its the server with the CentraLUG site on it. The server with the
mailing list and TWiki will be replaced sometime afterwards - hopefully
this summer.

> 
> -- Ben "Glacial progress" Scott

Ah. But nothing stands in the way of a glacier!

Thanks for setting up the info on the TWiki - I hope to get around to
reading it today.

- --Bruce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD6fK5/TBScWXa5IgRAjvGAKCUKT9x1R6W5ns0h9P4tv5MMkCKFACfQHsz
V5VDEFJcxg4QHrMUDTGzPoc=
=JWnD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org


Re: New Internet server

2005-10-20 Thread Bruce Dawson

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ted Roche wrote:

| On Oct 18, 2005, at 5:42 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
|
|>   Okay, so assuming everybody likes the idea, the next question is,
|> how do we begin setting this up?  I'd like this to be as much of a
|> "group effort" as possible.  Partly because I'm not familiar with some
|> of the software we need, partly because I'm only one person, but
|> mostly because it's just the Right Thing to do.  Aside from the
|> transparency aspect (I'm sure we're all aware of where I stand on
|> *that*), I think it could be a great learning experience for members
|> of the group, myself included.  I'd like to see learning available to
|> others.
|
| It sounds like a call for interest on the -announce list.

I would heartily recommend a brief message to the -discuss list
instead of the -announce list that points them to an appropriate
"top-level/project" page on the twiki.

| I have no objection to posting the whole discussion to the main
| -discuss list, maybe with a subject flag like [Web] or something.
| However, others may object to the increased traffic. I find the
| constant splintering of mailing lists more annoying than increased
| traffic on a list. How many  -discuss, -announce, -org, -jobs lists
| do we need?

We maybe could use the mailman topics feature, but only after we move
the mailman lists to the new server (and the latest version of mailman
that really supports topics).

| Also, establish a page on the wiki off of which you can branch the
| various discussions, plans, configurations.
|
|>   As far as calling for volunteers to help out, I'm contemplating just
|> posting an announcement to -discuss to see who might be interested.
|> What are people's thoughts on that?
|
| Post an announcement to... -announce. That repeats on -discuss also
| and may bring in a few subscribers only on -announce.

I don't think this is something appropriate for the -announce list,
but I'm easy to overrule. People interested in helping out would be on
the -discuss list anyway.

You may want to post a synopsis of the discussion, or put all the mail
messages into one (digest style) to sum up the situation for anyone
interested in volunteering.

- --Bruce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDV/nQ/TBScWXa5IgRAvcnAJ0XRfzo5ctsUiqAWu8z1G1DS5D2TgCcCtt1
/T9GwhocKCol7r7estv91oc=
=Wk+j
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org


Re: New Internet server

2005-10-20 Thread Ted Roche
On Oct 18, 2005, at 5:42 PM, Ben Scott wrote:  As Bruce reminded me, I've got a server I'm willing to lend to thecause of GNHLUG (even if that cause isn't that well defined :) ).  MVCommunications in Manchester has generously agreed to host it for us.That is great. We'll need to ensure their (and your) generosity is recognized appropriately.  Okay, so assuming everybody likes the idea, the next question is,how do we begin setting this up?  I'd like this to be as much of a"group effort" as possible.  Partly because I'm not familiar with someof the software we need, partly because I'm only one person, butmostly because it's just the Right Thing to do.  Aside from thetransparency aspect (I'm sure we're all aware of where I stand on*that*), I think it could be a great learning experience for membersof the group, myself included.  I'd like to see learning available toothers.It sounds like a call for interest on the -announce list. I have no objection to posting the whole discussion to the main -discuss list, maybe with a subject flag like [Web] or something. However, others may object to the increased traffic. I find the constant splintering of mailing lists more annoying than increased traffic on a list. How many  -discuss, -announce, -org, -jobs lists do we need?Also, establish a page on the wiki off of which you can branch the various discussions, plans, configurations.  As far as calling for volunteers to help out, I'm contemplating justposting an announcement to -discuss to see who might be interested. What are people's thoughts on that?Post an announcement to... -announce. That repeats on -discuss also and may bring in a few subscribers only on -announce.

Re: New Internet server

2005-10-20 Thread Bruce Dawson

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ted Roche wrote:

| Before we all start touting the clear superiority of a bunch of
| distros that all run the same binaries, might we not want to
| identify what we want to do with the box, what our parameters of
| security/ reliability/robustness/updatability/cutting-edge-access
| are, and then determine the distro (or the choice of building all
| from source) that best meets our needs? We could choose the Hummer
| first and then figure out how to get the kids to school in it,
| but going the other way 'round seems a bit more rational.

I thoroughly agree. Let's decide on what the server needs to do, then
decide on the distribution.

|> Would you like butter with your popcorn? :)
|
| Please pass the salt, too! I love fireworks.

Do you like your popcorn air-popped, or kettle-popped? (Just a
side-fireworks-show.)

- --Bruce

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDV8uG/TBScWXa5IgRAtFYAJ4h85K5EcwgQ8ndPtWj4mgmkCUNuQCeLMiU
va/Ixmw18CWc9wc4831ocgA=
=+zzc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org


Re: New Internet server

2005-10-20 Thread Ted Roche

On Oct 20, 2005, at 11:35 AM, Bill Sconce wrote:


As when Bill (inevitably) says, "Since this is GNHLUG, and we're about
'Free', our shining server needs to be... Debian"?


The first shot across the bow! Bill, there's no 'F' in GNHLUG 

Just as a counter-proposal, might not one of the vendors be  
interested in giving the group a FREE copy of their Enterprise Linux  
(with support and updates gratis) in exchange for a small discrete  
banner of thanks?


Before we all start touting the clear superiority of a bunch of  
distros that all run the same binaries, might we not want to identify  
what we want to do with the box, what our parameters of security/ 
reliability/robustness/updatability/cutting-edge-access are, and then  
determine the distro (or the choice of building all from source) that  
best meets our needs? We could choose the Hummer first and then  
figure out how to get the kids to school in it, but going the other  
way 'round seems a bit more rational.



Would you like butter with your popcorn?   :)


Please pass the salt, too! I love fireworks.
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org


Re: New Internet server

2005-10-20 Thread Bill Sconce
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 23:01:07 -0400
Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Ben Scott wrote:
> 
> | On 10/18/05, Bill McGonigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |
> |> *This server ought to be a shining city on a hill for Linux Done
> |> Right. Technologies, apps, security, etc.
> 
> I've been thinking about this... I think I'll find a really big bag of
> popcorn and an easy chair and be very well entertained for a while.



As when Bill (inevitably) says, "Since this is GNHLUG, and we're about
'Free', our shining server needs to be... Debian"?

Would you like butter with your popcorn?   :)

-Bill
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org


Re: New Internet server

2005-10-18 Thread Bruce Dawson

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ben Scott wrote:

| On 10/18/05, Bill McGonigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|> *This server ought to be a shining city on a hill for Linux Done
|> Right. Technologies, apps, security, etc.

I've been thinking about this... I think I'll find a really big bag of
popcorn and an easy chair and be very well entertained for a while.

;-) :-)

- --Bruce
PS: I don't want to douse the fire with cold water, but I also don't
want us to set unrealistic expectations. I'd settle for something
that's reliable and workable over something shiny that can't be touched.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDVbbz/TBScWXa5IgRAsLjAJ9K2rQIFlho7pZOiaKAdpV0oIconQCdHZr/
ummESYQHXI9PIDJv1XsOhxM=
=17zr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org


Re: New Internet server

2005-10-18 Thread Bruce Dawson

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ben Scott wrote:

| On 10/18/05, Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|> Actually, I'd like to get the server up and operational before
|> announcing it, but that's just how I feel. (There's no
|> credibility gap for some monkey wrench to weasel into.)
|
| See my reply to Bill M for why I prefer some advanced planning.

Saw 'em.

My thought was to get it up and operational with what's already there,
and if no one notices a difference, then we have more credibility.

Otherwise we have two potential situations:

~   1. We let people to coerce us into changing things, and someone
~  doesn't like it, or it doesn't work the way it was expected.
~   2. We don't let people coerce us into doing things different, and
~  we appear as authoritarian autocrats - or some such.

But we can discuss this Sunday. Or not.

| I'll bring the physical unit to this Sunday's summit.  I'll also
| write, print, and sign a letter of intent for "GNHLUG" to keep.
| Not that I think anyone here thinks I don't intend to go through
| with this, but I believe in doing things right, right from the
| start.  :)

And it releases you from liability (if you word it right). You may
want to wait until we're a non-profit so you can get a tax deduction.
(But that will probably take a while.)

|> | -- Ben "If we had a server we could host the server mailing
|> list on |  it" Scott
|>
|> Haven't you been saying that for a lng time? ;-)
|
|
| Hey, it's GNHLUG, ain't it?  ;-)

I didn't mean that as a heckle. Honest. :-)

- --Bruce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDVbPg/TBScWXa5IgRArAkAKC0SkD1hgrRStUwtYbg7FPIYWSpTACeNmDF
qADwBuVq6SVGDQtIuxyaT/k=
=2qF9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org


Re: New Internet server

2005-10-18 Thread Ben Scott
On 10/18/05, Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, I'd like to get the server up and operational before
> announcing it, but that's just how I feel. (There's no credibility gap
> for some monkey wrench to weasel into.)

  See my reply to Bill M for why I prefer some advanced planning.

  I'll bring the physical unit to this Sunday's summit.  I'll also
write, print, and sign a letter of intent for "GNHLUG" to keep.  Not
that I think anyone here thinks I don't intend to go through with
this, but I believe in doing things right, right from the start.  :)

> | -- Ben "If we had a server we could host the server mailing list on
> |  it" Scott
>
> Haven't you been saying that for a lng time? ;-)

  Hey, it's GNHLUG, ain't it?  ;-)

-- Ben "As guilty as anybody" Scott
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org


Re: New Internet server

2005-10-18 Thread Ben Scott
On 10/18/05, Bill McGonigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Call for volunteers on -discuss

  That's what I'm leaning towards.  If almost nobody is interested,
that bypasses a lot of discussion.  :)  But I want to see what the
rest of the "cabal" here think before I post to -discuss.

> 2. Start a distro war*

  No joke.  I'm interested in having a discussion about choice of
distro with any volunteers.  I don't hold any illusions that we're all
going to agree on what should be the The One True Linux Distribution. 
However, most distro wars occur in the context of the general case,
which makes them mainly academic.  Here we have a specific case, with
specific parameters and goals.  I'm curious as to how/if that will
impact the discussion.

  Of course, at some point, we're going to have to actually pick one
to install.  In the interests of fairness and actually getting some
real work done, I'm thinking it would be best to put a pre-established
time limit of a week or two on any such discussion.  Pragmatically, I
suspect we'll end up going with whatever most people have the most
experience with.

  If the whole thing dissolves into a flame-fest, we (for some
definition of "we") can always make the decision by fiat.

> 3. Setup a list on the new server about server maintenance

  Well, a lot of my questions/concerns/etc are about installation. 
The box will also be physically hosted someplace not easy to get to. 
So we have a chicken-and-egg problem there.  So I'm looking to get
some initial discussion about tech stuff before actual deployment of
the new server.  Eventually, it should be migrated there, of course.

> - anybody who changes anything should post to this list the changes and _make
> sure they get a copy of the message they just posted_.

  Good idea, there.  Indeed, one of the things I'm most concerned with
is coordination between many minds and hands.  I know some on -discuss
(Derek Martin, Paul Lussier, others) have experience in this area, and
I'm hoping they'll have the time and inclination to join in.

> *This server ought to be a shining city on a hill for Linux Done Right.
>   Technologies, apps, security, etc.

  My thoughts exactly.  I'd love for this to create useful material
that could be posted on a website.  Goals, design, implementation,
results, documentation, discussion, all that stuff.  Hosted on said
server, of course.

-- Ben "I wonder how many people will vote for SCO Linux?" Scott
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org


Re: New Internet server

2005-10-18 Thread Bruce Dawson

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ben Scott wrote:

|Hey all,
|
|BACKGROUND
|
|  Currently, the GNHLUG websites and mailing lists (and some of the
|local LUG stuff) are generously hosted on servers owned and operated
|by Bruce Dawson's company, Codemeta.   These servers also host
|services for paying customers, so we have to be fairly careful to not
|screw things up.  That means security and configuration management and
|all that stuff.
|
|  As Bruce reminded me, I've got a server I'm willing to lend to the
|cause of GNHLUG (even if that cause isn't that well defined :) ).  MV
|Communications in Manchester has generously agreed to host it for us.
|
|WHY
|
|  There are two major benefits I see to this:
|
|  One is that we can allow more people more access.  Right now, only a
|few GNHLUG people have shell access to anything.  Fewer still (only
|Bruce, I think) have privileged access.

There is a [very small] cabal of people with root access - just in
case I get hit by a bus or are otherwise uncommunicative. At least one
of them are on the mailing lists.

|If we have our own server,
|the requirements for access can be lower, as it isn't somebody's
|business that's on the line.  This is not to say the root password
|will be published on the TWiki; just that more people will be able to
|help do stuff.  This also means that critical maintenance of GNHLUG's
|Internet infrastructure stops being *just* Bruce Dawson's problem.
|I'm sure Bruce will appreciate that more then most.  :)

You betcha! One less "boss" to answer to!

|...

|  What I'm not so sure about is how to actually approach the mechanics
|of that collaboration.
|
|  Obviously, a mailing list would be used for some of this.  Should
|that list be separate from this -org list?  I'm not sure how much
|traffic it would generate, but given the minutia that computers tend
|to involve, maybe all the people on this -org list might want it
|elsewhere.  On the other hand, we're all pretty much computer geeks
|(or we wouldn't be here), so maybe it is topical.  For that matter,
|should it be on -discuss?

Start with what we have, expand it, and add new things?

|  As far as calling for volunteers to help out, I'm contemplating just
|posting an announcement to -discuss to see who might be interested.
|What are people's thoughts on that?

Actually, I'd like to get the server up and operational before
announcing it, but that's just how I feel. (There's no credibility gap
for some monkey wrench to weasel into.)

|MORE
|
|  Additional discussion will no doubt occur at the summit thing this
|Sunday.  In the meantime, as always, I welcome comments, suggestions,
|condemnations, flames, thoughts, vague notions, and incoherent
|ramblings.  :-)
|
|-- Ben "If we had a server we could host the server mailing list on
it" Scott

Haven't you been saying that for a lng time? ;-)

- --Bruce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDVXK//TBScWXa5IgRAnJOAKDE1uekSbG22fimFLdeVMgL1khA6wCgk3xu
3S2dacnmgmmGskkfx9jimT4=
=hlgl
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org


Re: New Internet server

2005-10-18 Thread Bill McGonigle

Roughly:

1. Call for volunteers on -discuss
2. Start a distro war*
3. Setup a list on the new server about server maintenance - anybody 
who changes anything should post to this list the changes _and make 
sure they get a copy of the message they just posted_. (I don't think 
server maintenance logs belong on the group-level organization list)


*This server ought to be a shining city on a hill for Linux Done Right. 
 Technologies, apps, security, etc.


-Bill
-
Bill McGonigle, Owner   Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC  Home: 603.448.1668
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Mobile: 603.252.2606
http://www.bfccomputing.com/Pager: 603.442.1833
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Text: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://blog.bfccomputing.com/

___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org