Re: [Gnoga-list] My two cents/patches contribution

Le 03/06/2016 à 14:23, Jeremiah Breeden a écrit : > Would 0001 inhibit building using MinGW? > I didn't try, but I don't think so. TBH, I don't know the differences between mingw and cygwin, but all this patch does is to replace /cygdrive/? with /?: in the definition of PREFIX -- J-P. Rosen

Re: [Gnoga-list] My two cents/patches contribution

Would 0001 inhibit building using MinGW? On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote: > 0002-Put-Id-of-missing-object-in-exception-message-when-G.patch > To get a bit more information in case of dispatching to non-existent object > >

[Gnoga-list] My two cents/patches contribution

0002-Put-Id-of-missing-object-in-exception-message-when-G.patch To get a bit more information in case of dispatching to non-existent object 0001-Force-PREFIX-to-Windows-syntax-when-used-with-cygwin.patch Under windows (with cygwin), make install didn't work because of the /cygdrive/c syntax that