On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Carlos Soriano Sanchez
csori...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Magdalen,
Thanks for your kind words.
Still people like Allan and other people did a lot of work on this as well.
I can provide my feelings when started contributing and personal vision,
but they have
Hi Allan,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Carlos Soriano Sanchez
csori...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Allan,
So if we continue with the wiki, most of the points I pointed before
continue to be a problem...
New jhbuild/git/whatever tutorials will came up... people won't find the
appropriate
Hi Allan,
Thanks a lot for your feedback, disagreement is the best to reach an agreement
=)
This is not important
I don't feel jhbuidl to me in practice very different. We do the same with git.
What I want is creating an
assistant (like a GtkAssistant,
Hello all,
We couldn't reach an agreement and the idea didn't have too much support from
long time community members, so I'm dropping this proposal
for now and therefore not taking an OPW intern.
Thanks all for the feedback and time.
Cheers,
Carlos Soriano
Hi Magdalen,
Thanks for your kind words.
Still people like Allan and other people did a lot of work on this as well.
I can provide my feelings when started contributing and personal vision,
but they have the experience.
So I won't go alone on this if they don't agree =) That would mean I'm
Hi Emmanuele,
So for the scope and scale you are right, but I'm trying to higher the scope
and scale
of building and contributing to GNOME as well. Not to be in par with Gtk+,
but enough to
deserve to be in the website.
You are logically right about Legitimacy is provided by
being on the
Hi Michael Hill,
Whops I misunderstood you.
You are right, HowDoI will continue to be like is now. I don't have any
intention there.
Actually, HowDoI/Jhbuild is so good that it could be in the official Jhbuild
documentation instead,
as a getting started with jhbuild since HowDoI/Jhbuild is well
Hi Allan,
So if we continue with the wiki, most of the points I pointed before continue
to be a problem...
New jhbuild/git/whatever tutorials will came up... people won't find the
appropriate one given that the wiki
is not official.
i.e. people say: it's a wiki, just modify it! Which is true,
Hi,
So after some work in GnomeLove and discussions in the gnome-love list, I would
like to make this proposal.
Read more here https://wiki.gnome.org/CarlosSoriano/GnomeLoveMoveTask
So I would want to have feedback on this idea over this week, since I will take
a intern from OPW for it, and
Hi Michael Hill,
Didn't you received private messages from newcomers overwhelmed with the
different ways on how to contribute a patch?
On how to do this or that in git? On how to know the code style? On how to
just get the code? Why I have to read multiple tutorials?
Because I did. And guides
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 09:54 -0400, Michael Hill wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Michael Catanzaro
mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
Having multiple conflicting tutorials is confusing to new
contributors,
and harmful when those two tutorials are incompatible.
Hi Michael,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org
wrote:
I'm really thinking of jhbuild specifically here. I don't think this is
a more general issue for us.
What advantages do you see in this page over GnomeLove/BuildGnome?
Carlos Soriano Sanchez csori...@redhat.com wrote:
...
I understand what you mean with removing community maintained, but can be
misleading for others. Let me explain:
developer.gnome.org is still maintained by the community, but they go through
a review process, and gives control to the
On 17/03/15 13:33, Carlos Soriano Sanchez wrote:
Hi,
So after some work in GnomeLove and discussions in the gnome-love list, I would
like to make this proposal.
Read more here https://wiki.gnome.org/CarlosSoriano/GnomeLoveMoveTask
So I would want to have feedback on this idea over this week,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org
wrote:
Having multiple conflicting tutorials is confusing to new contributors,
and harmful when those two tutorials are incompatible.
Disclaimer: I am not a jhbuild beginner.
Please find an example other than jhbuild for
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 07:17 -0400, Carlos Soriano Sanchez wrote:
I finished, and I linked BuildGnome on GnomeLove as the *official*
guide.
One month after that Ryan Lortie write a full jhbuild guide in
HowDoI/Jhbuild because he thought there were no guide for jhbuild!
He is a experienced
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 13:42 +0100, Andres G. Aragoneses wrote:
On 17/03/15 13:33, Carlos Soriano Sanchez wrote:
Hi,
So after some work in GnomeLove and discussions in the gnome-love list, I
would like to make this proposal.
Read more here
Hi Carlos,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Carlos Soriano Sanchez
csori...@redhat.com wrote:
I am not testing only how a beginner person that came to a hackfest, given
a tutorial on jhbuild and fedora distro, how it successfully builds.
This is only the tip of the iceberg. Jhbuild is just a
Carlos Soriano Sanchez csori...@redhat.com wrote:
...
So after some work in GnomeLove and discussions in the gnome-love list, I
would like to make this proposal.
Read more here https://wiki.gnome.org/CarlosSoriano/GnomeLoveMoveTask
So I would want to have feedback on this idea over this
Hi;
On 17 March 2015 at 12:33, Carlos Soriano Sanchez csori...@redhat.com wrote:
So after some work in GnomeLove and discussions in the gnome-love list, I
would like to make this proposal.
Read more here https://wiki.gnome.org/CarlosSoriano/GnomeLoveMoveTask
So I would want to have
Magdalen Berns m.be...@thismagpie.com wrote:
...
New jhbuild/git/whatever tutorials will came up... people won't find the
appropriate one given that the wiki
is not official.
Echo this. The developer.gnome jhbuild instructions are quite misleading
because they are not up to date. Yet, this
, Carlos Soriano Sanchez csori...@redhat.com wrote:
So if we continue with the wiki, most of the points I pointed before continue
to be a problem...
New jhbuild/git/whatever tutorials will came up...
I'm not sure why this is an issue... it is perfectly acceptable for
you to manage the
Completely agree with this idea :)
2015-03-17 16:31 GMT+01:00 Magdalen Berns m.be...@thismagpie.com:
+1
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Carlos Soriano Sanchez
csori...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
So after some work in GnomeLove and discussions in the gnome-love list, I
would like to make
23 matches
Mail list logo
