2010/1/22 Jim Campbell <jwcampb...@gmail.com>: > > I was actually interested in getting this going for this release, too. I > know we'd be under some time constraints, but I still think it could be > done, especially if we have a few people working on them.
It can be done for this release if we have a good plan, but there could be a problem. Rhythmbox doesn't really follow GNOME release scheme. They did a release (0.12.6, the one in Lucid) in November. Personally I don't know when will be the next release, I'm not subscribed to the mailing list. We should probably try to ask on IRC if they have a possible date when the next release will be. We may risk to work a lot in this period for the 2.30 release, and then (exagerating) Rhythmbox gets a release at the end of the year. If they have a pattern, they might do a release in March though (looking at their FTP space on gnome [1]). But anyway, this shouldn't stop us from planning and start working on it. ;-) Ciao. [1] http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/rhythmbox/0.12/ -- Milo Casagrande <mi...@gnome.org> _______________________________________________ gnome-doc-list mailing list gnome-doc-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list