Hi,
While reviewing gs-use-system-search I decided to remove "and" from the
list of matching items, see last comment here [1].
I checked the style guide [2] and found this: Do not connect list items
with conjunctions such as "and" or "or".
If you agree, I think gs-use-system-search can be
to deal with.
It's certainly not a major roadblock. But a lot of people
do ask about it when they're first learning. So I have to
assume that, while it might be a mild annoyance, it's a
widespread mild annoyance.
You reference lists here, but steps are done in the same way. If you
made
and it took a little bit
to get me in, but it looks interestingly easy to use and to get used.
FWIW, from my personal experience, what I feel more complicated are
tables rather than lists.
Ciao.
--
Milo Casagrande mi...@gnome.org
___
gnome-doc-list mailing list
experience, what I feel more complicated are
tables rather than lists.
In my experience, tables are complicated in any language. ;-)
--
Shaun McCance
http://syllogist.net/
___
gnome-doc-list mailing list
gnome-doc-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org
lists or tree lists.
(The processing model for those would make it stupidly
difficult to deal with.) And we could possibly do the
same thing for table cells, though I'd need to look more
thoroughly into how much that complicates things.
For basic lists and steps lists, though, processing
and match in a single list.
list
pOne/p
pTwo/p
item
pThree/p
pi.e. 3/p
/item
/list
The same would apply for item elements in a steps list,
but not for item elements in terms lists or tree lists.
(The processing model for those would make it stupidly
difficult to deal with.) And we
Hi Milo,
On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 14:27 +0200, Milo Casagrande wrote:
It will absolutely be easier to write, but it could end up being more
difficult to read the code. Can't we just suppress the p from
item and have it optional in case we need it? (like two paragraphs
in an item) If there's no
Hi Shaun,
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 18:23 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
(2) Not particularly elegant.
So I thought about this one before as well. I also thought
about the same thing for td. And I just couldn't figure
out a way that didn't run afoul of (2). It just feels hacky,
although I
Hi guys,
Suggested alteration to the Mallard spec.
SUGGESTION
Mallard lists usually require the author to type
itempSomething/p/item multiple times. Typing the same tags again
and again is tiresome. I propose a shorthand tag which behaves exactly
the same as itemp, but which is shorter
