Re: Unicode typography in translations

2016-11-15 13:14 GMT+01:00 : > I am talking about recent Ubuntu and Mint. > I'm really surprised. I believe they are using UTF-8 like everything else in 2016. I can't find any information about it. Could you please elaborate on the issue? Best regards, -- Piotr Drąg

Re: Unicode typography in translations

2016-11-15 2:26 GMT+01:00 Rafael Fontenelle : > It would be nice to have a script with regexp that could compare msgstr and > msgid in a PO file, and report strings that are not in compliance with > GNOME's HIG typography. I don't have such scripting skill, but if someone >

Re: Unicode typography in translations

Hi Rafael 2016-11-15 2:26 GMT+01:00 Rafael Fontenelle : > 2016-11-14 12:31 GMT-02:00 Piotr Drąg : >> >> Hello translators, >> >> You might have noticed a lot of changes in master branches regarding >> the use of Unicode typography. GNOME HIG has

Re: Unicode typography in translations

I am talking about recent Ubuntu and Mint. Best regards Keld On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:18:14AM +0100, Piotr Dr??g wrote: > 2016-11-15 7:21 GMT+01:00 : > > There are still systems that run in 8-bit. > > Will text downgrade nicely if non-8-bit typography is being used in the >

String additions to 'gtk+.gtk-3-22'

This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: https://l10n.gnome.org. There have been following string additions to module 'gtk+.gtk-3-22': + "Usage:\n gtk-builder-tool [COMMAND] FILE\n\nCommands:\n validate Validate the file\n simplify [OPTIONS] Simplify the

Re: Unicode typography in translations

2016-11-15 7:21 GMT+01:00 : > There are still systems that run in 8-bit. > Will text downgrade nicely if non-8-bit typography is being used in the > translations? > I honestly don't know. What are those systems? Do they run modern GNOME? Best regards, -- Piotr Drąg