Re: GCab 1.1

2018-01-27 Thread Piotr Drąg
2018-01-27 15:28 GMT+01:00 Claude Paroz : > Le 26. 01. 18 à 17:17, Piotr Drąg a écrit : >> >> 2018-01-26 11:26 GMT+01:00 Claude Paroz : > > >>> That was an issue with D-L reading the meson build file (which was itself >>> fine). >>> Should be fixed now. >>>

Re: GCab 1.1

2018-01-27 Thread Claude Paroz
Le 26. 01. 18 à 17:17, Piotr Drąg a écrit : 2018-01-26 11:26 GMT+01:00 Claude Paroz : That was an issue with D-L reading the meson build file (which was itself fine). Should be fixed now. Thank you for fixing it! Could you take a look at fwupd? It seems damned-lies

Re: GCab 1.1

2018-01-26 Thread Piotr Drąg
2018-01-26 11:26 GMT+01:00 Claude Paroz : > Le 26. 01. 18 à 10:38, Richard Hughes a écrit : >> >> On 25 January 2018 at 21:44, Enrico wrote: >>> >>> Please, could you take a look at an error on generating the POt file? >> >> >> I'm not sure what's wrong

Re: GCab 1.1

2018-01-26 Thread Claude Paroz
Le 26. 01. 18 à 10:38, Richard Hughes a écrit : On 25 January 2018 at 21:44, Enrico wrote: Please, could you take a look at an error on generating the POt file? I'm not sure what's wrong there. Is it perhaps some issue with the switch to meson? If it helps, you can

Re: GCab 1.1

2018-01-26 Thread Richard Hughes
On 25 January 2018 at 21:44, Enrico wrote: > Please, could you take a look at an error on generating the POt file? I'm not sure what's wrong there. Is it perhaps some issue with the switch to meson? If it helps, you can generate the pot file localy using `ninja

Re: GCab 1.1

2018-01-25 Thread Enrico
-comments --output gcab.pot --msgid-bugs-address https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=msitools=I18N+L10N=gcab Thanks in advance, Enrico (pt_BR team) 2018-01-25 17:56 GMT-02:00 Richard Hughes <hughsi...@gmail.com>: > Hello my wonderful translators! > > We're going to releas

GCab 1.1

2018-01-25 Thread Richard Hughes
Hello my wonderful translators! We're going to release gcab 1.1 soon (1.0 was somewhat rushed out the door due to a security issue) and I wanted to ask you all if you can check the existing and new strings. The 1.1 release is probably what's headed into lots of LTS releases, so it would be good