Re: Heads up: Geary mainline development branch renamed to `mainline`

2019-04-26 Thread Ask Hjorth Larsen via gnome-i18n
Dear all, Am Fr., 26. Apr. 2019 um 10:43 Uhr schrieb Mathieu Bridon : > > On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 10:38 +0200, Niels De Graef via desktop-devel- > list wrote: > > Note that you don't need to script this kind of stuff, if you use the > > following tricks: > > > > # 1. This creates a symbolic link

Re: Heads up: Geary mainline development branch renamed to `mainline`

2019-04-26 Thread Niels De Graef via gnome-i18n
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:14 AM Ask Hjorth Larsen via desktop-devel-list wrote: > > Am Mi., 24. Apr. 2019 um 13:57 Uhr schrieb Michael Gratton : > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 13:31, Daniel Mustieles García > > wrote: > > > So hardcoding the name "mainline" to the list of branches that Damned

Re: Heads up: Geary mainline development branch renamed to `mainline`

2019-04-24 Thread Ask Hjorth Larsen via gnome-i18n
Am Mi., 24. Apr. 2019 um 13:57 Uhr schrieb Michael Gratton : > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 13:31, Daniel Mustieles García > wrote: > > So hardcoding the name "mainline" to the list of branches that Damned > > Lies' looks up resolves the problem for you... and tomorrow another > > maintainer decides

Re: Heads up: Geary mainline development branch renamed to `mainline`

2019-04-24 Thread Michael Gratton
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 13:31, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: So hardcoding the name "mainline" to the list of branches that Damned Lies' looks up resolves the problem for you... and tomorrow another maintainer decides to rename it's master branch to whatever_non_offensive_name and DL breaks

Re: Heads up: Geary mainline development branch renamed to `mainline`

2019-04-24 Thread Daniel Mustieles García via gnome-i18n
So hardcoding the name "mainline" to the list of branches that Damned Lies' looks up resolves the problem for you... and tomorrow another maintainer decides to rename it's master branch to whatever_non_offensive_name and DL breaks again until a patch is submited... no, sorry but this is not a

Re: Heads up: Geary mainline development branch renamed to `mainline`

2019-04-24 Thread Ask Hjorth Larsen via gnome-i18n
Dear Michael, Am Mi., 24. Apr. 2019 um 13:17 Uhr schrieb Michael Gratton : > > Hi Daniel, > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:46, Daniel Mustieles García via gnome-i18n > wrote: > > Great, but having modules with no standard name for > > master/trunk/whatever branch might break applications like

Re: Heads up: Geary mainline development branch renamed to `mainline`

2019-04-24 Thread Michael Gratton
Hi Daniel, On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:46, Daniel Mustieles García via gnome-i18n wrote: Great, but having modules with no standard name for master/trunk/whatever branch might break applications like Damned Lies, so this rename should be reconsidered, at least until we decide to rename the

Re: Heads up: Geary mainline development branch renamed to `mainline`

2019-04-24 Thread Ask Hjorth Larsen via gnome-i18n
Dear all, Having a master branch does not imply slavery anymore than chess master, masterpiece, jedi master, or master of science in engineering, but not having a master branch, and particularly having inconsistent branch names, means extra real work for real people, and particularly those who

Re: Heads up: Geary mainline development branch renamed to `mainline`

2019-04-24 Thread Daniel Mustieles García via gnome-i18n
El mié., 24 abr. 2019 a las 11:25, Carmen Bianca Bakker (< car...@carmenbianca.eu>) escribió: > Je mer, 2019-04-24 je 10:32 +0200, Andre Klapper skribis: > > > , as exposed in #324), but coherence across modules should be kept. > > > > I agree that it would be good to consider renaming all master

Re: Heads up: Geary mainline development branch renamed to `mainline`

2019-04-24 Thread Carmen Bianca Bakker
Je mer, 2019-04-24 je 10:32 +0200, Andre Klapper skribis: > > , as exposed in #324), but coherence across modules should be kept. > > I agree that it would be good to consider renaming all master branches. Then mightn't it be better to bring up the topic with GNOME and/or Git upstream? Because

Re: Heads up: Geary mainline development branch renamed to `mainline`

2019-04-24 Thread Daniel Mustieles García via gnome-i18n
El mié., 24 abr. 2019 a las 10:33, Andre Klapper () escribió: > On Wed, 2019-04-24 at 08:43 +0200, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > > I don't know where is the advantage of this renaming > > That is already clearly explained in > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/geary/issues/324 Just because

Re: Heads up: Geary mainline development branch renamed to `mainline`

2019-04-24 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, 2019-04-24 at 08:43 +0200, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > I don't know where is the advantage of this renaming That is already clearly explained in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/geary/issues/324 > (we don't belong to Linux kernel develpment And nobody ever said so, so I don't know

Re: Heads up: Geary mainline development branch renamed to `mainline`

2019-04-24 Thread Daniel Mustieles García via gnome-i18n
Hi Michael, As I've already commented in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/geary/issues/403, having a "mainline" branch instead of a "master" branch is confusing for applications like Damned Lies, breaking for example cherry-picks from other branches to "master" branch, as it doesn't exist. Stable

Heads up: Geary mainline development branch renamed to `mainline`

2019-04-23 Thread Michael Gratton
Hi all, Just a quick heads-up for people who have use git directly for traslating Geary: As part of https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/geary/issues/324 The `master` branch has been renamed to `mainline`. Same great content (and command line completion prefix), snazzy new name. :) So it would