Push emails for Git

2009-02-12 Thread Owen Taylor
So, trying to plan out a out what mails we want sent when changes get pushed to git.gnome.org. What's below is a rough proposal for the subject line and body for pretty much each possible of "ref" (branch or tag) update that might be made. Each time you do 'git push' you can update multipe refs, s

Re: R-T doesn't care about i18n? (was: Problem with committing to gnome-screensaver)

2009-02-12 Thread Claudio Saavedra
El jue, 12-02-2009 a las 12:30 +0100, Luca Ferretti escribió: > [1] but little shocked for recent "I'm myself and I don't care about > GNOME community rules" events :( I think the most important thing to learn from these "events" is that when you delay a community-based decision so long, people st

Re: R-T doesn't care about i18n? (was: Problem with committing to gnome-screensaver)

2009-02-12 Thread Christian Rose
On 2/12/09, Luca Ferretti wrote: > Il giorno mer, 11/02/2009 alle 09.44 -0500, William Jon McCann ha > scritto: > > When we move to git immediately after 2.26.0 I trust that everyone > > will be informed and ready to tackle the workflow changes that result. > > I suggest that instead of conti

Fw: Seed GIT Conversion

2009-02-12 Thread Robert Carr
==Original message text=== From: Robert Carr Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 9:05:14 EST Subject: Seed GIT Conversion First, thanks for converting Seed to git.gnome.org, glad to finally be away from SVN. However, as I pointed out to Owen in IRC (and he asked me to post here) a fe

Re: R-T doesn't care about i18n? (was: Problem with committing to gnome-screensaver)

2009-02-12 Thread Luca Ferretti
Il giorno mer, 11/02/2009 alle 09.44 -0500, William Jon McCann ha scritto: > When we move to git immediately after 2.26.0 I trust that everyone > will be informed and ready to tackle the workflow changes that result. > I suggest that instead of continuing this conversation we focus on > making su

Re: R-T doesn't care about i18n? (was: Problem with committing to gnome-screensaver)

2009-02-12 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Mittwoch, den 11.02.2009, 12:49 +0100 schrieb Wouter Bolsterlee: > That said, I'd like to see these questions answered: > > 1. Did you speak for yourself, or did you speak on behalf of the release >team when you were making this totally objectionable statement? > > 2. What do other release