Re: Infrastructure | Gitlab mail integration on security issue broken? (#572)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: @ebassi Any idea if it ever worked properly? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/572#note_1092633 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org

Re: Infrastructure | Accessing download.gnome.org from Hong Kong and Taiwan shouldn't be redirect to mirrors in China (#560)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: FYI you can also test it via https://download.gnome.org/gnomeos/40.0/gnome_os_installer_40.0.iso?mirrorlist -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/560#note_1077038 You're

Re: Infrastructure | Accessing download.gnome.org from Hong Kong and Taiwan shouldn't be redirect to mirrors in China (#560)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: https://download.gnome.org includes OSSPlanet mirror now. I've also changed Chinese mirrors to serve traffic only to users in China, so it should work fine now for users in TW/HK. Thanks! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https

Re: Infrastructure | Accessing download.gnome.org from Hong Kong and Taiwan shouldn't be redirect to mirrors in China (#560)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #560: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/560 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/560 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | New mirror: Taiwan , mirror.ossplanet.net / ftp.ubuntu-tw.org (#561)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #561: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/561 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/561 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | New mirror: Taiwan , mirror.ossplanet.net / ftp.ubuntu-tw.org (#561)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: And the mirror is up in the redirection service now. Thanks! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/561#note_1077034 You're receiving this email because of your account

Re: Infrastructure | New mirror: Taiwan , mirror.ossplanet.net / ftp.ubuntu-tw.org (#561)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/561#note_1076191 The backing volume is 224G right now. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/561

Re: Infrastructure | New mirror: Taiwan , mirror.ossplanet.net / ftp.ubuntu-tw.org (#561)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: Credentials sent via e-mail. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/561#note_1075879 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org

Re: Infrastructure | Accessing download.gnome.org from Hong Kong and Taiwan shouldn't be redirect to mirrors in China (#560)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/560#note_1075296 I will send you credentials over e-mail today. Do you expose rsync endpoint too? The mirroring server uses it to verify the mirror is up to date. -- Reply

Re: Infrastructure | Accessing download.gnome.org from Hong Kong and Taiwan shouldn't be redirect to mirrors in China (#560)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/560#note_1075294 Can you make sure they also expose rsync? We use it to determine which mirrors are ready to handle the traffic. -- Reply to this email directly or view

Re: Infrastructure | Accessing download.gnome.org from Hong Kong and Taiwan shouldn't be redirect to mirrors in China (#560)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: Could you try to reach out to people behind http://ftp.tku.edu.tw/ ? I will send an e-mail to xtom.com.hk. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/560#note_1075183 You're

Re: Infrastructure | Accessing download.gnome.org from Hong Kong and Taiwan shouldn't be redirect to mirrors in China (#560)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: The mirror service chooses mirrors based on distance. We would need to ask some universities in Taiwan and/or Hong Kong to host a mirror for us. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure

Re: Infrastructure | Set up redirect from www.gnome.org/news to foundation.gnome.org/news (#554)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #554: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/554 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/554 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | Set up redirect from www.gnome.org/news to foundation.gnome.org/news (#554)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: This is done now. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/554#note_1069246 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org

Re: Infrastructure | Download server redirects to a broken server when adding omitted slash (#551)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: This is worked around now by 1) fixing redirect to download-fallback 2) enabling index on download-fallback. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/551#note_1069226 You're

Re: Infrastructure | Download server redirects to a broken server when adding omitted slash (#551)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #551: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/551 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/551 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | Remove tarball from download.gnome.org (#544)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: @jtojnar Should be fixed now. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/544#note_1066796 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org

Re: Infrastructure | "Latest release" link redirects to GNOME 3.36 release notes (#549)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #549: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/549 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/549 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | "Latest release" link redirects to GNOME 3.36 release notes (#549)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: Fixed manually and landed a proper fix into our scripts. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/549#note_1066753 You're receiving this email because of your account

Re: Infrastructure | Set up subdomain for GNOME 40 Release notes website (#542)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #542: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/542 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/542 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | Set up subdomain for GNOME 40 Release notes website (#542)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: Fixed by Andrea. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/542#note_1062098 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org

Re: Infrastructure | Set up subdomain for GNOME 40 Release notes website (#542)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #542: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/542 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/542 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | Set up subdomain for GNOME 40 Release notes website (#542)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: Done: https://fourty.gnome.org/ -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/542#note_1062084 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org

Re: Infrastructure | Expose FTP volume as mirrorbits' fallback server (#535)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: Done, download-fallback.gnome.org is used as the fallback server now. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/535#note_1061829 You're receiving this email because of your account

Re: Infrastructure | Expose FTP volume as mirrorbits' fallback server (#535)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #535: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/535 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/535 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | Well known file for Matrix is missing, resulting in service outage (#540)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: This is fixed now. ``` ~ > curl -I https://www.gnome.org/.well-known/matrix/client HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: nginx/1.14.2 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 21:37:32 GMT Content-Type: application/octet-stream Content-Length: 153 Last-Modified: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 21:34:27

Re: Infrastructure | Well known file for Matrix is missing, resulting in service outage (#540)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #540: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/540 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/540 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | Expose FTP volume as mirrorbits' fallback server (#535)

Reassigned Issue 535 https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/535 Assignee changed to Bartłomiej Piotrowski -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/535 You're receiving this email because

Infrastructure | Expose FTP volume as mirrorbits' fallback server (#535)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski created an issue: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/535 When a new tarball is uploaded, mirrorbits incorrectly redirects request to a fallback mirror which does not have the file yet. We should expose the FTP volume at download.gnome.org

Re: Infrastructure | New password protected etherpad for Governance Committee (#534)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #534: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/534 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/534 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | New password protected etherpad for Governance Committee (#534)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: Done, I sent you the credentials on Matrix. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/534#note_1054474 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org

Re: Infrastructure | Flatpak jobs fails with permission denied (#526)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: I've disabled problematic runners for now. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/526#note_1038503 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org

Re: Infrastructure | Wrong redirect to dotsrc mirror (#524)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #524: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/524 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/524 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | Wrong redirect to dotsrc mirror (#524)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: It should be fixed now. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/524#note_1033918 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org

Re: Infrastructure | My personal GitLab repos are corrupted somehow... (#523)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: Closing in favor of the originally reported issue: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/GitLab/-/issues/492 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/523#note_1031836 You're

Re: Infrastructure | My personal GitLab repos are corrupted somehow... (#523)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #523: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/523 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/523 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | My personal GitLab repos are corrupted somehow... (#523)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: It seems to be GitLab issue we're seeing also in other projects. You can work it around by setting a different merging method, but other than this, we're waiting for an answer from GitLab team. Some of the upstream issues: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org

Re: Infrastructure | gnome-build-meta runners failing to connect to download.gnome.org (#518)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #518: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/518 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/518 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | gnome-build-meta runners failing to connect to download.gnome.org (#518)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: Going to close it as none of these look to be an actual issue other than usual hiccups caused by updating GitLab and GitLab runners upgrade -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure

Re: Infrastructure | gnome-build-meta runners failing to connect to download.gnome.org (#518)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/518#note_1024025 Thanks, upgraded. We had to hold upgrades there for a bit as the package used wrong architecture for the binary. -- Reply to this email directly or view

Re: Infrastructure | gnome-build-meta runners failing to connect to download.gnome.org (#518)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: Seems to be doing just fine now: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/-/jobs/1122901 These Docker failures were caused due to rolling runners upgrade. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure

Re: Infrastructure | How to download recordings from GNOME Africa? (#501)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #501: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/501 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/501 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | How to download recordings from GNOME Africa? (#501)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: Yup, I believe they need to be made public to be visible for Federico. @federico BBB stores slides, webcam videos and audio separately; you will probably want to use https://github.com/plugorgau/bbb-render to produce an actual video. -- Reply

Re: Infrastructure | CI fails on the gcc175-flatpak runner (#498)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #498: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/498 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/498 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | CI fails on the gcc175-flatpak runner (#498)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: Looks like `x86_64` tag shouldn't be there as it's a flatpak runner. Deleted it. Thanks! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/498#note_981280 You're receiving this email

Re: Infrastructure | Help us re-set up our CircleCI build (#497)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: I followed your steps and ended up pressing `Stop building` button. You should be able to set it up now. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/497#note_980656 You're receiving

Re: Infrastructure | CI is broken due to new docker pull limits, requires GitLab configuration change? (#496)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #496: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/496 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/496 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | CI is broken due to new docker pull limits, requires GitLab configuration change? (#496)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: At first glance no, I don't see any failed jobs in Epiphany projects caused by Docker Hub since Nov 19 (which is when pull-through registry has been deployed). Please open a new issue when it starts happening again. -- Reply to this email directly or view

Re: Infrastructure | CI is broken due to new docker pull limits, requires GitLab configuration change? (#496)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: Runners hosted by OSUOSL already have a pull-through registry, all other runners have a separate IP. Does it actually still happen, outside of ongoing incident at OSUOSL affecting the registry availability? -- Reply to this email directly or view

Re: Infrastructure | Mirror for gimp-macos-build disappeared (#495)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: I changed your permissions to `read` and back to `admin`, has it changed anything to you? You definitely have the same privileges to both repositories now. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure

Re: Infrastructure | Mirror for gimp-macos-build disappeared (#495)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: You are though; these are admin permissions, not regular write access. Do you need to be a member of GNOME organization? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/495#note_977552

Re: Infrastructure | Mirror for gimp-macos-build disappeared (#495)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #495: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/495 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/495 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | Mirror for gimp-macos-build disappeared (#495)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: I flipped the switch and the mirror should be restored on the next push/merge to the repository. I'll handle the admin access part once it appears on GitHub. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure

Re: Infrastructure | Merge bot for Shell and Mutter (#464)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #464: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/464 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/464 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | Merge bot for Shell and Mutter (#464)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: Marge has been deployed to `gnome-build-meta` project in OpenShift. Jordan has access to the config there. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/464#note_952173 You're

Re: Infrastructure | gnome-build-meta keeps producing corrupt ostree objects (#446)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/-/merge_requests/917 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/446#note_951233 You're receiving this email because of your account

Re: Infrastructure | gnome-build-meta keeps producing corrupt ostree objects (#446)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #446: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/446 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/446 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | gnome-build-meta keeps producing corrupt ostree objects (#446)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: At least now everything seems to be installable for both x86_64 and aarch64. I will be landing some safe guards here and there this week. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues

Re: Infrastructure | Set up documentation status tracker (#431)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: @shaunm Any preferences about the domain it should be deployed at? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/431#note_951141 You're receiving this email because of your account

Re: Infrastructure | The future of sdk.gnome.org (#133)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #133: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/133 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/133 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | The future of sdk.gnome.org (#133)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: I have reworked Flathub builders donated by Codethink as GitLab runners, they're available at `aarch64` and `flatpak-aarch64` tags. (I lost their original hostnames so I don't know if these were `gnome1` and `gnome2` unfortunately.) Closing it as from

Re: Infrastructure | gcc179-flatpak (donated by OSU Open Source Lab) out of disk space (#465)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: I cleaned it up shortly after the bug was opened, but there's still something wrong with hardware. Mmultiple jobs timed out on pulling Docker images and eventually it powered off completely. I have reported it to OSUOSL; runners hosted on the server

Re: Infrastructure | gcc179-flatpak (donated by OSU Open Source Lab) out of disk space (#465)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #465: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/465 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/465 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | gnome-build-meta keeps producing corrupt ostree objects (#446)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #446: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/446 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/446 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | gnome-build-meta keeps producing corrupt ostree objects (#446)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: The nightly repo has been pruned and fscked; it is installable to me with and without from-scratch deltas. `org.gnome.Sdk/x86_64/3.38` and `org.gnome.Sdk/aarch64/3.38` on Flathub also look good now, no corrupted objects in generated deltas. -- Reply

Re: Infrastructure | Strange problem with progress CI runner (#427)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: The runtime has been pushed after slow aarch64 build and GPGME heartbeat is deployed. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/427#note_913219 You're receiving this email because

Re: Infrastructure | Strange problem with progress CI runner (#427)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/427#note_913068 (Also it blocks releasing GPGME-based health check that should fix the originally described problem.) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab

Re: Infrastructure | Strange problem with progress CI runner (#427)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/427#note_913065 I purged local and remote CAS cache. The build is still running. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure

Re: Infrastructure | Strange problem with progress CI runner (#427)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/427#note_912720 Oh well, gcc 101. Thanks! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/427#note_912720

Re: Infrastructure | Strange problem with progress CI runner (#427)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/427#note_912682 Looks like I'm doing something wrong on Ubuntu 20.04: ``` root@1a4c9e48ef7b:/# gcc `gpgme-config --libs --cflags` gpgme.c /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/cc6UE2OX.o

Re: Infrastructure | Strange problem with progress CI runner (#427)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: @mcatanzaro Saying "again" is a stretch given the corrupted object comes from GNOME, not Flathub. Just restart the job. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/427#n

Re: Infrastructure | The future of sdk.gnome.org (#133)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/133#note_912144 Please poke me when they're accessible as we would like to manage them similarly to all the other runners. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab

Re: Infrastructure | The future of sdk.gnome.org (#133)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: @jjardon Any news on Codethink ARM machines? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/133#note_912133 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org

Re: Infrastructure | Take down or redirect "GAIL Reference Manual" on https://developer.gnome.org/gail-libgail-util/ (#314)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: Closing as it's not our call. If GTK team says it should be deleted completely, please re-open the issue. Thanks! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/314#note_912120 You're

Re: Infrastructure | Take down or redirect "GAIL Reference Manual" on https://developer.gnome.org/gail-libgail-util/ (#314)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #314: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/314 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/314 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | Greylist email rather than block based on RBLs like Barracuda (#417)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: Going to close it for now. I'll be looking at switching to rspamd and if it works well, we may reduce number of RBLs. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/417#note_912077

Re: Infrastructure | Greylist email rather than block based on RBLs like Barracuda (#417)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #417: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/417 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/417 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | Strange problem with progress CI runner (#427)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: This is a problem with flat-manager. I restarted it right now; @akitouni have you had a chance to look at GPGME-based health check? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/427

Re: Infrastructure | CI runner out of disk space? (#425)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #425: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/425 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/425 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | CI runner out of disk space? (#425)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: There's over 20GB of free space right now so it must be freed since this job. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/425#note_911450 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | Greylist email rather than block based on RBLs like Barracuda (#417)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/417#note_906398 I'm trying to explain we are already using both. Just as your e-mail will re-send the temporarily rejected message, so are over thousand of others. -- Reply

Re: Infrastructure | Greylist email rather than block based on RBLs like Barracuda (#417)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: We are using RBLs AND greylisting AND Bayesian spam filtering, and all three reject significant number of junk messages. Despite of this, we still have a problem with multiple mailing lists being heavily spammed. I'll be playing around with rspamd but RBLs

Re: Infrastructure | Restore GitLab notification settings (#400)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #400: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/400 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/400 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | This is a test issue (#416)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #416: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/416 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/416 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | flatmgr-finish is broken: "Corrupted file object" (#409)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: @alatiera has already reported this over IRC and there's `ostree fsck` in progress since around noon CEST. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/409#note_902243 You're

Re: Infrastructure | GNOME 3.40 milestone is not available (#404)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: The milestone can be renamed later. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/404#note_899854 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org

Re: Infrastructure | GNOME 3.40 milestone is not available (#404)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #404: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/404 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/404 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | GNOME 3.40 milestone is not available (#404)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: Done. @mcatanzaro Is it something that Release Team should be handling? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/404#note_899711 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | Replace secur...@gnome.org with a web form (#395)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #395: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/395 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/395 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | Replace secur...@gnome.org with a web form (#395)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: https://security.gnome.org is up; I asked Caroline if she could make sure it looks in line with the shop. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/395#note_899708 You're receiving

Re: Infrastructure | Get gnome-connections enrolled in the translation system (#405)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: Moved to GNOME group. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/405#note_899704 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org

Re: Infrastructure | Get gnome-connections enrolled in the translation system (#405)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #405: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/405 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/405 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | Please archive gnome-continuous (#401)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #401: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/401 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/401 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | Please archive gnome-continuous (#401)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: The projects are archived now. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/401#note_899692 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org

Re: Infrastructure | Move pika-backup to World (#398)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: This is usually out of scope for infrastructure team but I don't see a reason why it wouldn't be accepted. Moved. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/398#note_899684 You're

Re: Infrastructure | Move pika-backup to World (#398)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #398: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/398 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/398 You're receiving this email because of your

Re: Infrastructure | Update LICENSE (!2)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: This is an empty repo, not sure why license would belong here. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/merge_requests/2#note_899283 You're receiving this email because of your account

Re: Infrastructure | Update LICENSE (!2)

Merge Request !2 was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Merge Request URL: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/merge_requests/2 Project:Branches: heidianna613/Infrastructure:thegirlintheroom613-master-patch-06162 to Infrastructure/Infrastructure:master Author: heidianna613

Re: Infrastructure | Request for Portuguese Translation Team (pt) mailing list (#402)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski commented: Hi Juliano, I think that it would be vastly preferred to use https://discourse.gnome.org at this point. There's [i18n](https://discourse.gnome.org/tag/i18n) tag but I guess we can also create a subcategory. Any thoughts about this @ebassi? -- Reply

Re: Infrastructure | Restore GitLab notification settings (#400)

Issue was closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski Issue #400: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/400 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/400 You're receiving this email because of your

  1   2   3   >