Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

Andrea Veri commented: All done, https://os.gnome.org is live, thanks! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/456#note_933559 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org.

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

Issue was closed by Andrea Veri Issue #456: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/456 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/456 You're receiving this email because of your account on

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

Andrea Veri commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/456#note_933411 OK, all good at https://gitlab.gnome.org/Teams/Releng/gnome-os-site/pages. Will land reverse proxy config during the next hour. -- Reply to this email directly or view it

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

Andrea Veri commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/456#note_933388 Ok, moved, @bertob, mind removing / re-adding the gitlab-ci.yml file so that https://gitlab.gnome.org/Teams/Releng/gnome-os-site/pages becomes enabled again? Thanks! --

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

Jordan Petridis commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/456#note_933379 Let's move it to Teams/releng for now and give access to the repo to Tobias. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

Tobias Bernard commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/456#note_98 Feel free to just move the repo, as long as you give me access to the new one :) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

Andrea Veri commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/456#note_933308 Sure, I can move the project over to World or to any other place that @alatiera feels appropriate and land config/sub-domain. Thanks! -- Reply to this email directly or

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

Thibault Martin commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/456#note_933306 Shouldn’t it move to World/ instead of bertob/ first? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

Andrea Veri commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/456#note_933305 @alatiera @bertob @thibaultamartin should I go ahead and land the config/sub-domain? Thanks! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

Sri Ramkrishna commented: Love the design, @bertob ! I'm thinking os.gnome.org is good. it's easy to remember and involves less typing. I'd like to also offer images for extension testers - but it doesn't have to be user viewable. It would certainly let me write a good blog post on how to

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

Tobias Bernard commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/456#note_932400 Happy to move it, no strong opinion on where to. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

Abderrahim Kitouni commented: Another thing is we should probably move it off of @bertob's namespace into either gnome-build-meta repo or somewhere in Infrastructure. What do you think? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

Tobias Bernard commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/456#note_932377 Ok, then I guess `os.gnome.org` it is :) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

Andrea Veri commented: The other issue is we'd like to avoid having a reverse proxy on top of another reverse proxy as www.gnome.org runs on Openshift, which is configured with a set of routers acting as reverse proxies themselves. So I'd suggest going with os.gnome.org directly. --

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

Thibault Martin commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/456#note_932350 Thanks! Not sure what others think, but I think we should avoid ending up with https://bertob.pages.gitlab.gnome.org/gnome-os-site/ in the end-users’ browser at any

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

Andrea Veri commented: @thibaultamartin that really depends on how you want the website domain to be visualized, a plain redirect between gnome.org/os and the gitlab pages URL is just going to represent itself in your browser by referencing the final URL aka

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

Thibault Martin commented: There also is another thing to consider regarding the domain names: there are plans to split the Foundation and GNOME Product websites. In the near future there will be: - a www.gnome.org Wordpress instance - a separate Wordpress instance for the foundation The

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

Andrea Veri commented: @alatiera surely doable, let's wait for the involved stakeholders opinion on what sub-domain should be used etc. and we can land the requested config for the nicer URL to be there :) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: