Issue was closed by Andrea Veri
Issue #481: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/481
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/481
You're receiving this email because of your account on
Andrea Veri commented:
Marking as resolved, please re-open if there's anything else you'd like me to
land! Thanks!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/481#note_962769
You're receiving this email because of
Andrea Veri commented on a discussion:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/481#note_954459
@aday anything else you believe is missing here or are we good to go?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
Andrea Veri commented on a discussion:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/481#note_954433
Fixed!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/481#note_954433
You're receiving this email
Rafael Fontenelle commented:
Consider changing Github -> GitHub (nitpicky, I know )
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/481#note_954424
You're receiving this email because of your account on
Andrea Veri commented on a discussion:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/481#note_954403
Standard accounts were the ones you could create without using a third-party
authentication provider before we removed that possibility due to spam :)
Renamed log in -->
Allan Day commented on a discussion:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/481#note_954400
So "Standard" is an instance-specific account? That's such a ambiguous heading;
so confusing. :disappointed:
I noticed that the new text uses "log in" rather than "sign in".
Andrea Veri commented:
Landed the desired improvements, please let me know if it looks good! Regarding
changing the Standard header, we cannot as only the LDAP provider can be
customized :)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
