Allan Day commented:
I've filed #481 as a follow-up item.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/433#note_953604
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org.
Claudio Wunder commented:
I was going to add my input, but I see the issue is closed already.
> If we had unlimited time and people to work on this I’d draft the following
> roadmap:
You can count on me to help with the web-development related stuff. @averi if
you need me for anything,
Claudio Wunder commented on a discussion:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/433#note_953533
This looks good!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/433#note_953533
You're receiving
Issue was closed by Andrea Veri
Issue #433: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/433
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/433
You're receiving this email because of your account on
Andrea Veri commented on a discussion:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/433#note_953522
@thibaultamartin please keep going with the table you had in mind and if you
plan coming up with a roadmap feel free creating another issue and we'll be
looking into it in
Andrea Veri commented on a discussion:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/433#note_953521
Looks good, thanks!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/433#note_953521
You're receiving
Allan Day commented on a discussion:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/433#note_953148
Fantastic, thanks @averi ! The new page looks much better. I've made some edits
of my own - just general polish - feel free to accept or roll back as you see
fit. :)
--
Thibault Martin commented on a discussion:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/433#note_953069
After discussing the issue a bit with Andrea, this is not the right place for
the roadmap.
I’ll turn https://status.gnome.org/ into a table as mentioned in parent
Thibault Martin commented:
In my understanding we need to have three "trust level" regarding our
infrasturcture:
* Anonymous - no account created
* Community - people who have created an account, but are not part of the
Foundation
* Foundation - foundation members
We also need a list of
Andrea Veri commented:
@aday, @amrowsell: I went ahead and landed the following improvements:
1. Removed the AccountsTeam wiki section all together and unified with
https://wiki.gnome.org/Infrastructure
2. Revamped the /Infrastructure space adding more user level information and
Andrea Veri commented:
On my radar for this week, will update the issue once I have the new pieces
laid out.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/433#note_952231
You're receiving this email because of your
A_M_ Rowsell commented:
I have to agree with this: even coming from a developer perspective and wanting
to contribute code, I was (and still am, to some degree) extraordinarily
confused about the accounts system. It feels like at some point everything was
supposed to be unified under LDAP,
12 matches
Mail list logo
