On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Christer Edwards
christer.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Christer Edwards
christer.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
I've created a wiki page in the Sysadmin namespace to document the
ideas we've agreed on.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Jeff Schroeder
jeffschroe...@computer.org wrote:
label really isn't the best place for wiki and it seems like the first
that should move. Are / were you still working on this? I know ray was
helping do it. Do you think you could build a RHEL6 wiki vm and then
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 10:18 -0700, Christer Edwards wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Jeff Schroeder
jeffschroe...@computer.org wrote:
label really isn't the best place for wiki and it seems like the first
that should move. Are / were you still working on this? I know ray was
helping
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 12:48 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
Am I correct in my understanding that ldap is going to go on the
smaller of the two new machines? Should / can dns go with it? Do we
want to keep them separated? Remember, we do have a secondary NS
server now at the Canonical DC.
To
Dear all,
IMHO, What I'm thinking is just like you guys did, those mission
critical services should reside in non-virtualized system, so
NFS (everyone's data is on it)
LDAP (you have to have this one for authentication)
DNS (When it is down, you can not log into any server)
are better running on
