Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

2020-10-12 Thread Tobias Bernard
Tobias Bernard commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/456#note_932400 Happy to move it, no strong opinion on where to. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:

[GNOME Blogs] Some plugins were automatically updated

2020-10-12 Thread GNOME Blogs Mailer
Howdy! Some plugins have automatically updated to their latest versions on your site at https://blogs.gnome.org. No further action is needed on your part. These plugins are now up to date: - Cache Enabler version 1.5.1 If you experience any issues or need support, the volunteers in the

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

2020-10-12 Thread Tobias Bernard
Tobias Bernard commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/456#note_932377 Ok, then I guess `os.gnome.org` it is :) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

2020-10-12 Thread Abderrahim Kitouni
Abderrahim Kitouni commented: Another thing is we should probably move it off of @bertob's namespace into either gnome-build-meta repo or somewhere in Infrastructure. What do you think? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

2020-10-12 Thread Thibault Martin
Thibault Martin commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/456#note_932350 Thanks! Not sure what others think, but I think we should avoid ending up with https://bertob.pages.gitlab.gnome.org/gnome-os-site/ in the end-users’ browser at any

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

2020-10-12 Thread Andrea Veri
Andrea Veri commented: The other issue is we'd like to avoid having a reverse proxy on top of another reverse proxy as www.gnome.org runs on Openshift, which is configured with a set of routers acting as reverse proxies themselves. So I'd suggest going with os.gnome.org directly. --

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

2020-10-12 Thread Sri Ramkrishna
Sri Ramkrishna commented: Love the design, @bertob ! I'm thinking os.gnome.org is good. it's easy to remember and involves less typing. I'd like to also offer images for extension testers - but it doesn't have to be user viewable. It would certainly let me write a good blog post on how to

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

2020-10-12 Thread Andrea Veri
Andrea Veri commented: @thibaultamartin that really depends on how you want the website domain to be visualized, a plain redirect between gnome.org/os and the gitlab pages URL is just going to represent itself in your browser by referencing the final URL aka

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

2020-10-12 Thread Thibault Martin
Thibault Martin commented: There also is another thing to consider regarding the domain names: there are plans to split the Foundation and GNOME Product websites. In the near future there will be: - a www.gnome.org Wordpress instance - a separate Wordpress instance for the foundation The

Re: Infrastructure | Alias for GNOMEOS Nightly site (#456)

2020-10-12 Thread Andrea Veri
Andrea Veri commented: @alatiera surely doable, let's wait for the involved stakeholders opinion on what sub-domain should be used etc. and we can land the requested config for the nicer URL to be there :) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: